Ratings

4
out of 10

GreatSchools Rating

The GreatSchools rating is a simple tool for parents to compare schools based on test scores. It compares schools across the state, where the highest rated schools in the state are designated as “Above Average” and the lowest “Below Average.” It is designed to be a starting point to help parents make baseline comparisons. We always advise parents to visit the school and consider other information on school performance and programs, as well as consider their child's and family's needs as part of the school selection process.

Learn More »


Student Group Comparison

How does this school serve different groups of students?

Red = Bottom 30% of schools in the state, Orange = Middle 40% of schools in the state, Green = Top 30% of schools in the state
= State Avg.
All Students
38%
3256 students
Hispanic
38%
96% of population
White
44%
2% of population
All Students
38%
3256 students
Economically disadvantaged
38%
89% of population
English language learners
1%
14% of population
Students with disabilities
11%
 
Not economically disadvantaged
34%
 
All Students
38%
3256 students
Male
36%
53% of population
Female
41%
46% of population
= State Avg.
All Students
12%
3256 students
Hispanic
12%
96% of population
White
13%
2% of population
All Students
12%
3256 students
Economically disadvantaged
12%
89% of population
English language learners
0%
14% of population
Students with disabilities
3%
 
Not economically disadvantaged
7%
 
All Students
12%
3256 students
Male
12%
53% of population
Female
11%
46% of population
= State Avg.
All Students
80%
3256 students
Hispanic
81%
96% of population
White
60%
2% of population
All Students
80%
3256 students
Economically disadvantaged
81%
89% of population
English language learners
62%
14% of population
Students with disabilities
54%
 
All Students
80%
3256 students
Male
75%
53% of population
Female
86%
46% of population
= State Avg.
All Students
43%
3256 students
Hispanic
43%
96% of population
White
40%
2% of population
African American
100%
<1% of population
Asian
100%
<1% of population
Native American or Native Alaskan
0%
<1% of population
All Students
43%
3256 students
Economically disadvantaged
43%
89% of population
All Students
43%
3256 students
Male
35%
53% of population
Female
51%
46% of population
Ratings are out of 10
4
All Students
3256 students
4
Hispanic
96% of population
4
White
2% of population
4
All Students
3256 students
4
Economically disadvantaged
89% of population
1
English language learners
14% of population
2
Students with disabilities
 
4
Not economically disadvantaged
 
4
All Students
3256 students
4
Male
53% of population
4
Female
46% of population

Dig deeper


Test scores

The bar charts below tell what percentage of students are performing at or above grade-level.

California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP)


Showing results for all students

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

English Language Arts

Math

About the test

In 2014-2015, California tested students using the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP), administered through the online Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments. These are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test, English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer adaptive test and (2) a performance task; administered within a 12-week window beginning at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, or within in a 7-week window beginning at 80 percent of the instructional year for grade eleven. The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing-efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.

Source: CA Dept. of Education

California Standards Tests


Showing results for all students

Algebra I

Algebra II

Biology I

English Language Arts

General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)

Geometry

Integrated/Coordinated Science 1

World History

Algebra I

Algebra II

Biology I

Chemistry

English Language Arts

Geometry

High School (Summative) Mathematics (Grade 9-11)

Science

World History

Algebra I

Algebra II

Biology I

Chemistry

Earth Science

English Language Arts

Geometry

High School (Summative) Mathematics (Grade 9-11)

US History

World History

About the test

In 2014-2015 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in science in grades 5, 8 and 10. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Source: CA Dept. of Education


College readiness

The path to college

This school
State
80%
GRADUATE HIGH SCHOOL
82%


Source: See notes

AP courses and testing

Source: See notes

College entrance testing

SAT score
1279
This school's average
1473
State average
Average ACT score (1-36 scale)
18
This school's average
22
State average
Source: See notes

The SAT

Source: See notes

The ACT

Source: See notes

Climate

Schools that are well organized, safe, and supportive are much more likely to be successful.

High academic expectations for all students

This score measures the percent of parents and students that agree to strongly agree that this school sets high academic expectations for its students and expects them to be college-bound.

Group Score District average
Total 62% 72%
Parents 62% 70%
Students 63% 74%
Source: See notes

Healthy, respectful relationships

This score measures the percent of students and employees that agree to strongly agree that this school has a positive learning environment and cultivates an atmosphere of respect.

Group Score District average
Total 70% 77%
Students 59% 74%
Employees 82% 81%
Source: See notes

A safe, clean and orderly environment

This score measures the percent of parents, students, and employees that agree to strongly agree that this school has a well-kept facility and a safe environment conducive to learning.

Group Score District average
Total 56% 70%
Parents 50% 78%
Students 42% 58%
Employees 75% 74%
Source: See notes

Strong family engagement

This score measures the percent of parents and employees that agree to strongly agree that this school engages parents and communicates with families to promote student learning.

Group Score District average
Total 53% 68%
Parents 47% 66%
Employees 58% 71%
Source: See notes

Teacher support and opportunities for collaboration

This score measures the percent of employees that agree to strongly agree that this school ensures that teachers work well together, learn from one another, have opportunities for professional development, and feel supported by the administration.

Group Score District average
Total 54% 66%
Employees 54% 66%
Source: See notes

Survey participation

Respondent group Number
Students 1039
Parents 80
School employees 30
Source: See notes

Sources

The path to college CA Dept. of Education, 2014-2015
AP courses and testing CA Dept. of Education, 2014-2015
College entrance testing CA Dept. of Education, 2014-2015
The SAT CA Dept. of Education, 2014-2015
The ACT CA Dept. of Education, 2014-2015
High academic expectations for all students Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013
Healthy, respectful relationships Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013
A safe, clean and orderly environment Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013
Strong family engagement Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013
Teacher support and opportunities for collaboration Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013
Survey participation Los Angeles Unified School District, 2012-2013