Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Winston Churchill Middle School

Public | 6-8 | 926 students

Last modified
Community Rating

4 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
No new ratings
2012:
Based on 4 ratings
2011:
Based on 4 ratings
2010:
Based on 1 rating

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

42 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted November 24, 2012

I am a student at this school. The health at this shool isn't that great. In the mornings you can buy hot chocolate w/ whip cream and chocolate suace; at lunch there is a stand with pizza, baked chips, drinks, cup noodles, and candy people can buy with their lunch; at the end of school there is a stand with different ice cream sutff you can buy and on Friday Jamba Juice comes. I feel as though this school doesn't influence health but uses kid's interests to support the funds. Also because of our language requirement, i.b. kids have P.E every other week or quarter. [switches off with our elective (based on elective)] Though I must say that the P.E. teachers are try their best with the time we have them.


Posted September 11, 2012

My son in in his third year at Churchill, 8th grader. We have had a wonderful experience watching him grow as an IB student. He loves Japanese and Science, and is a whiz in math, so it's like he's with his "people." The bar is set very high and the students rise to the occasion.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted April 18, 2012

I am a student at Churchill, and the IB program is fantastic. We have great teachers that really care about us and help us learn. Our school has 4 great language departments, Japanese, Chinese, French, and Spanish. The non-ib program is not that good, so only enroll at Churchill for the IB program. We are all very supportive of each other and are like one big IB family.


Posted January 8, 2012

The IB program is excellent!! But regular ed is TERRIBLE and HORRIFYING. Filled with bullies...etc. SO ONLY ENROLL YOU'RE CHILD IN IB PROGRAM! for smart kids
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 29, 2011

We've found Churchill provides instruction in at a level and depth unmatched by other middle schools in the area. In particular, Churchill offers a much richer music and foreign language curriculum. Our son attended from 6th - 8th grade and our daughter is a new student. The school culture has a real positive energy, the teachers and parent volunteers are fantastic, and we are so happy with our choice of school!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 12, 2011

I went to Winston Churchill in 1999-2000. I loved that school. I did better in that school than I ever did in Oklahoma Public Schools. As for the "teachers" discouraging the students, I dont think it is happening that way. The students have to be wiling to learn as well as the teachers willing to teach. In Oklahoma, I went through all 4 years of my high school career with at least 3 of my teachers saying, and I quote, "I do not care whether you pass or fail this class, I get paid either way!"


Posted March 24, 2011

Churchill use to be a wonderful school. Not any longer. Students are disrespectful to the teachers and their peers producing chaos in classrooms. There is a bullying issue that the adminstration is unable to control. Our student is going elsewhere for 8th grade next year.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted January 7, 2011

I daughter brought home homework only two times and one of those homework assignments was to color an Easter basket. She got straight A's on her report card. I then asked that she be placed in more changeling classes and she was. The problem was that the teachers were DISCOURAGING the students form pursuing the advanced levels. The reason was that there were too many students and they needed to reduced the size of the class. Instead of encouraging students to challenge themselves and increase the size of the "advanced" classes they wanted to increase the remedial ones. Keep in mind that the "advance" classes are not that advanced. It is so bad that many English teachers read to their class rather than have the students read the books assigned.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 17, 2010

Churchill is home to the finest acadmic program around--the International Baccalaureate program, and has many wonderful, caring teachers as well.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 7, 2009

This school is a great school and the teachers are fantastic...Im a former student of churchill and i wish i could go back
—Submitted by a student


Posted October 6, 2009

A controversial and inappropriate issue arose in one of my son's class. The teacher was rude and unresponsive. The vice-principal was understanding and helpful, but unable to reach resolution. The principal was unresponsive, uninterested, and displeased about the problem in general meaning, he just wanted it swept under the carpet. This is not an example of effective or good administration.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 1, 2009

My daughter attends this school all the staff is friendly and they truley care
—Submitted by a parent


Posted April 15, 2009

Right now I go to this awesome school, and I am in 7th grade IB. I think the staff works really hard so the students can have a learning experience. I'm glad I came here.
—Submitted by a student


Posted March 8, 2009

I had a student in the High Achieving classes at Churchill, not IB. The teachers cared, they were phenomenal, they connected with her, challenged her, and gave her an excellent education!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted March 5, 2009

All the school cares about is the IB program.School isn`t that great
—Submitted by a student


Posted January 2, 2009

My oldest son went to Churchill and currently have my other son attending. The administration at Churchill is great and I can't say enough good things about the principal and vice principals. My son is having difficulty adjusting to middle school and the school counselor and teachers have worked we us -- communication with teachers and administration is fantastic.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted December 17, 2008

I have found that this school takes teaching to the levels that encourages the students to want to learn. The teachers treat the students with consideration and respect. I have noticed my child grow to be a better person and feel confident. He feels he is getting the education he has so missed. The teachers encouarage the students at Churchill.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted December 15, 2008

I am a sixth grade student at churchill, and I love it!! It is very different from elementary school though, with the lockers and changing classes, but it is very easy to get used to. The I.B. program is extremely stimulating and challenging, but it makes you think, which is a good thing. In sixth grade I.B. science you will complete an Endangered Species Project, and it is really a lot of fun to be able to make yourself so much more aware of the world. Sixth grade is all about non- procrastination, and has helped me a lot. Because, I am a procrastinator. Churchill is really a great school. The teachers are awesome!!
—Submitted by a student


Posted November 7, 2008

My husband and I are very pleased with Churchill. The principal and teachers are enthusiastic and really seem to like the kids. They make learning as fun as it should be. Our daughter is very happy with her new school, too.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 1, 2008

This my childs 2nd yr here at Winston. Started with 6th. Last year was very hard to get used to the way the school is set up. A big difference from elementary school. I like the school and enjoy all that my child learns. Mr. Shoemake is fantastic about communicating with the parents and answers letters when written to. I wish the teachers put a bit more effort in getting the parents involved, especially when there are huge challanges in the childs academic work. This has helped my child grow up alot and see what the real world is all about. I would recommend the school to anyone whose child needs the challange and is bored and wants a great education. Although we are not going to continue to Mira Loma we are staying with the IB program and going on to Oakmont for their IB program for High School.
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

The API reflects year-over-year schools performance based on STAR test score results from spring 2012.

This school's
API score

848

Change from
2011 to 2012

-10

API Statewide Rank
(2011)

8 / 10

API Similar Schools Rank (2011)

6 / 10


API Growth scores over time

Did this school meet the API goal this year?
The state goal for API is 800. All schools that are below 800 are assigned an API improvement target each year.
  • This school met the state goal of 800.

API Growth scores by subgroup

In addition to schoolwide API scores, each student subgroup receives an API score.
Did this school meet all the API goals for student subgroups this year?
The state goal for the API is 800. All the student subgroups at a school that are below 800 are assigned an API improvement target each year.
  • This school did not meet all student subgroup API targets for 2012

This school's
API score

848

What is the API?
The Academic Performance Index (API) is a single number assigned to each school by the California Department of Education to measure overall school performance and improvement over time on statewide testing. The API ranges from 200 and 1000, with 800 as the state goal for all schools.
Change from
2011 to 2012

-10

Change from 2011 to 2012
Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school’s test score performance improved between Spring 2011 and Spring 2012. The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools. Schools scoring below an 800 are given at least a 5 point target for the next year.
API Statewide Rank
(2011)

8 / 10

API Statewide Rank (2011)
The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school’s API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range. The 2011 rank is based on results from tests students took in Spring 2011.
API Similar Schools Rank (2011)

6 / 10

API Similar Schools Rank (2011)
The API Similar Schools Rank ranges from 1 to 10. It shows how the school compares to other schools with similar student demographic profiles. The California Department of Education uses parent education level, poverty level, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.
English Language Arts

The state average for English Language Arts was 59% in 2012.

242 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
71%

2011

 
 
90%

2010

 
 
100%

2009

 
 
98%
Math

The state average for Math was 55% in 2012.

242 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
69%

2011

 
 
87%

2010

 
 
100%

2009

 
 
98%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 86% in 2012.

105 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
73%

2011

 
 
86%

2010

 
 
91%

2009

 
 
86%
English Language Arts

The state average for English Language Arts was 62% in 2012.

321 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
73%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
68%

2009

 
 
65%
Math

The state average for Math was 52% in 2012.

212 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
57%

2011

 
 
48%

2010

 
 
49%

2009

 
 
34%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 49% in 2012.

79 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
31%

2011

 
 
31%

2010

 
 
43%

2009

 
 
49%
English Language Arts

The state average for English Language Arts was 59% in 2012.

344 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
70%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
64%

2009

 
 
56%
General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)

The state average for General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards) was 32% in 2012.

122 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
26%

2011

 
 
12%

2010

 
 
19%

2009

 
 
21%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 87% in 2012.

126 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
96%

2011

 
 
91%

2010

 
 
88%

2009

 
 
89%
History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative

The state average for History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative was 52% in 2012.

361 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
62%

2011

 
 
55%

2010

 
 
57%

2009

 
 
54%
Science

The state average for Science was 66% in 2012.

345 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
74%

2011

 
 
73%

2010

 
 
70%

2009

 
 
68%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

English Language Arts

All Students71%
Females72%
Males70%
African American38%
Asian95%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino24%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)73%
Economically disadvantaged43%
Non-economically disadvantaged90%
Students with disabilityn/a
Students with no reported disability74%
English learner15%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - not a high school graduaten/a
Parent education - high school graduate43%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)72%
Parent education - college graduate78%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate99%
Parent education - declined to state33%

Math

All Students69%
Females69%
Males70%
African American27%
Asian93%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino29%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)71%
Economically disadvantaged42%
Non-economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilityn/a
Students with no reported disability72%
English learner21%
Fluent-English proficient and English only72%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - not a high school graduaten/a
Parent education - high school graduate37%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)67%
Parent education - college graduate80%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate95%
Parent education - declined to state36%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

Algebra I

All Students73%
Females72%
Males75%
African Americann/a
Asian89%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
White (not Hispanic)66%
Economically disadvantaged54%
Non-economically disadvantaged76%
Students with no reported disability73%
English learnern/a
Fluent-English proficient and English only73%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented80%
Parent education - not a high school graduaten/a
Parent education - high school graduaten/a
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)60%
Parent education - college graduate68%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate85%
Parent education - declined to staten/a

English Language Arts

All Students73%
Females80%
Males65%
African American50%
Asian95%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino43%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)76%
Economically disadvantaged48%
Non-economically disadvantaged90%
Students with disability23%
Students with no reported disability75%
English learner9%
Fluent-English proficient and English only78%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented99%
Parent education - not a high school graduate29%
Parent education - high school graduate47%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)74%
Parent education - college graduate81%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate93%
Parent education - declined to state51%

Math

All Students57%
Females55%
Males58%
African American25%
Asian93%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino28%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)57%
Economically disadvantaged37%
Non-economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disabilityn/a
Students with no reported disability58%
English learner17%
Fluent-English proficient and English only61%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - not a high school graduate15%
Parent education - high school graduate38%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)48%
Parent education - college graduate64%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate89%
Parent education - declined to state44%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

Algebra I

All Students31%
Females34%
Males26%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino42%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)30%
Economically disadvantaged29%
Non-economically disadvantaged32%
Students with disabilityn/a
Students with no reported disability31%
English learnern/a
Fluent-English proficient and English only32%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talentedn/a
Parent education - not a high school graduaten/a
Parent education - high school graduaten/a
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)24%
Parent education - college graduate41%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate36%
Parent education - declined to state25%

English Language Arts

All Students70%
Females79%
Males58%
African American48%
Asian91%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino36%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)72%
Economically disadvantaged46%
Non-economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilityn/a
Students with no reported disability71%
English learner14%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - not a high school graduate33%
Parent education - high school graduate47%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)67%
Parent education - college graduate80%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate95%
Parent education - declined to state42%

General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)

All Students26%
Females29%
Males24%
African American10%
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino21%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)32%
Economically disadvantaged21%
Non-economically disadvantaged44%
Students with disability24%
Students with no reported disability27%
English learner6%
Fluent-English proficient and English only29%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talentedn/a
Parent education - not a high school graduate14%
Parent education - high school graduate11%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)30%
Parent education - college graduate35%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduaten/a
Parent education - declined to state23%

Geometry

All Students96%
Females99%
Males88%
African Americann/a
Asian97%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
White (not Hispanic)95%
Economically disadvantaged93%
Non-economically disadvantaged95%
Students with no reported disability95%
Fluent-English proficient and English only95%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - not a high school graduaten/a
Parent education - high school graduaten/a
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)93%
Parent education - college graduate98%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate97%
Parent education - declined to staten/a

History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative

All Students62%
Females69%
Males53%
African American28%
Asian92%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino23%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)64%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Non-economically disadvantaged83%
Students with disability12%
Students with no reported disability66%
English learner26%
Fluent-English proficient and English only64%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - not a high school graduate24%
Parent education - high school graduate31%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)61%
Parent education - college graduate72%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate91%
Parent education - declined to state29%

Science

All Students74%
Females78%
Males69%
African American44%
Asian92%
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino45%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Samoann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)78%
Economically disadvantaged53%
Non-economically disadvantaged90%
Students with disability36%
Students with no reported disability76%
English learner36%
Fluent-English proficient and English only77%
Migrant educationn/a
Gifted and talented99%
Parent education - not a high school graduate33%
Parent education - high school graduate50%
Parent education - some college (includes AA degree)67%
Parent education - college graduate87%
Parent education - graduate school/post graduate95%
Parent education - declined to state52%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2011-2012 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled. The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California. The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See California's state standards

Source: California Department of Education

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
White 59% 28%
Asian 15% 8%
Hispanic or Latino 12% 49%
African American 9% 7%
American Indian or Alaska Native 2% 1%
Filipino 1% 3%
Pacific Islander 1% 1%
Multiple or No Response 0% 3%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
English language learners 14%N/A24%
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 236%N/A52%
Source: 1 CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009
Source: 2 NCES, 2008-2009

Home languages of english learners

Language This school State average
Russian 41% 0%
Spanish 41% 85%
Farsi (Persian) 5% 0%
Korean 5% 1%
Rumanian 5% 0%
Ukrainian 5% 0%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Teacher experience

  This school District averageState average
Average years teaching in district 9N/A11
Average years teaching 9N/A13
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Teacher credentials

  This school District averageState average
Full credential 97%N/A96%
Emergency credential or waiver 0%N/A2%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

4900 Whitney Avenue
Carmichael, CA 95608
Phone: (916) 971-7324

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT