Image of globe and book on table

Plymouth School District

GreatSchools Rating: 5 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

77 Main St
Terryville, CT 06786
Litchfield County
Map >

PH: (860) 314-8005

  • Grades PK-12
  • 1848 students
  • 4 schools

View all schools in this district >


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 71% (2009)
 71% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2009.

Writing
 84% (2009)
 80% (2008)
 76% (2007)
 73% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math
 84% (2009)
 74% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 72% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4

Reading
 77% (2009)
 62% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2009.

Writing
 81% (2009)
 81% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2009.

Math
 77% (2009)
 77% (2008)
 80% (2007)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5

Reading
 76% (2009)
 78% (2008)
 71% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2009.

Science
Data not available for this district (2009)
 83% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing
 90% (2009)
 85% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 87% in 2009.

Math
 85% (2009)
 81% (2008)
 80% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6

Reading
 87% (2009)
 76% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 71% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Writing
 84% (2009)
 79% (2008)
 86% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math
 87% (2009)
 84% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Math was 87% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7

Reading
 83% (2009)
 81% (2008)
 73% (2007)
 72% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 84% in 2009.

Writing
 83% (2009)
 77% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 81% in 2009.

Math
 89% (2009)
 86% (2008)
 82% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8

Reading
 82% (2009)
 73% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 75% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Science
Data not available for this district (2009)
 78% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing
 83% (2009)
 78% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 75% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2009.

Math
 90% (2009)
 84% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students71%
Female77%
Male64%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White72%
Economically disadvantaged63%
Not economically disadvantaged73%
Students without disabilities76%
Not English language learners70%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female90%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners83%

MathThis District
All Students84%
Female82%
Male87%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners84%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students77%
Female75%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged54%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities83%
Not English language learners78%

WritingThis District
All Students81%
Female81%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis District
All Students77%
Female72%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Economically disadvantaged58%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students without disabilities83%
Not English language learners77%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students76%
Female75%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged64%
Not economically disadvantaged79%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners76%

WritingThis District
All Students90%
Female91%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged86%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners90%

MathThis District
All Students85%
Female86%
Male84%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Economically disadvantaged69%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners85%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students87%
Female84%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged77%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners87%

WritingThis District
All Students84%
Female92%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners85%

MathThis District
All Students87%
Female84%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged84%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners88%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students83%
Female92%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners84%

WritingThis District
All Students83%
Female91%
Male77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis District
All Students89%
Female90%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged90%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners89%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students82%
Female84%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners82%

WritingThis District
All Students83%
Female89%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners83%

MathThis District
All Students90%
Female93%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White91%
Economically disadvantaged85%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners90%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 CAPT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10

Reading
 77% (2009)
 92% (2008)
 75% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 82% in 2009.

Science
 84% (2009)
 85% (2008)
 83% (2007)
The state average for Science was 78% in 2009.

Writing
 85% (2009)
 92% (2008)
 74% (2007)
The state average for Writing was 87% in 2009.

Math
 82% (2009)
 84% (2008)
 81% (2007)
The state average for Math was 78% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 CAPT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students77%
Female85%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White78%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners77%

ScienceThis District
All Students84%
Female83%
Male84%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners84%

WritingThis District
All Students85%
Female91%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged62%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners85%

MathThis District
All Students82%
Female86%
Male79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners82%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher1312

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic94%64%
Hispanic3%17%
Black, not Hispanic2%14%
Asian/Pacific Islander<1%4%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%<1%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program18%30%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$12,293$13,277
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional60%62%
Student and staff support9%9%
Administration8%10%
Other expenditures23%18%
Source: NCES, 2006-2007

Back to top >
Tips and Advice by Grade Level
Tips and Advice for Your Kindergartener Tips and Advice for Your First-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Second-Grader
Tips and Advice for Your Third-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Fourth-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Fifth-Grader