Image of globe and book on table

Regional School District 16

GreatSchools Rating: 7 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

207 New Haven Rd
Prospect, CT 06712
New Haven County
Map >

PH: (203) 758-6671

  • Grades PK-12
  • 2609 students
  • 5 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:


 CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 87% (2009)
 82% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2009.

Writing
 94% (2009)
 91% (2008)
 92% (2007)
 95% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math
 92% (2009)
 91% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4

Reading
 78% (2009)
 75% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2009.

Writing
 93% (2009)
 90% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 89% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2009.

Math
 89% (2009)
 86% (2008)
 92% (2007)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5

Reading
 90% (2009)
 84% (2008)
 78% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2009.

Science
Data not available for this district (2009)
 95% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing
 92% (2009)
 91% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 92% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 87% in 2009.

Math
 91% (2009)
 90% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6

Reading
 87% (2009)
 82% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Writing
 90% (2009)
 85% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math
 93% (2009)
 86% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Math was 87% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7

Reading
 87% (2009)
 91% (2008)
 80% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 84% in 2009.

Writing
 85% (2009)
 84% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 81% in 2009.

Math
 88% (2009)
 87% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8

Reading
 86% (2009)
 81% (2008)
Data not available for this district (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Science
Data not available for this district (2009)
 77% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing
 92% (2009)
 87% (2008)
Data not available for this district (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2009.

Math
 93% (2009)
 85% (2008)
Data not available for this district (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students87%
Female87%
Male85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners87%

WritingThis District
All Students94%
Female97%
Male90%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White94%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students without disabilities98%
Not English language learners94%

MathThis District
All Students92%
Female94%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White91%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners92%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students78%
Female80%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White79%
Not economically disadvantaged81%
Students without disabilities82%
Not English language learners78%

WritingThis District
All Students93%
Female96%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White94%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners93%

MathThis District
All Students89%
Female87%
Male92%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners89%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students90%
Female94%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners90%

WritingThis District
All Students92%
Female97%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners92%

MathThis District
All Students91%
Female92%
Male91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White91%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners92%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students87%
Female91%
Male82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners87%

WritingThis District
All Students90%
Female98%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners90%

MathThis District
All Students93%
Female97%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners93%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students87%
Female91%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged62%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners88%

WritingThis District
All Students85%
Female94%
Male76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged75%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students with disabilities25%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners85%

MathThis District
All Students88%
Female86%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners88%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students86%
Female90%
Male82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners86%

WritingThis District
All Students92%
Female98%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Economically disadvantaged83%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners92%

MathThis District
All Students93%
Female93%
Male92%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White94%
Economically disadvantaged83%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners93%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 CAPT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10

Reading
 84% (2009)
 80% (2008)
 84% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 82% in 2009.

Science
 86% (2009)
 80% (2008)
 95% (2007)
The state average for Science was 78% in 2009.

Writing
 93% (2009)
 89% (2008)
 91% (2007)
The state average for Writing was 87% in 2009.

Math
 84% (2009)
 82% (2008)
 90% (2007)
The state average for Math was 78% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 CAPT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students84%
Female93%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners84%

ScienceThis District
All Students86%
Female85%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged67%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners86%

WritingThis District
All Students93%
Female97%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities98%
Not English language learners94%

MathThis District
All Students84%
Female81%
Male87%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners84%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

  • In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Academic Performance Test (CAPT) to test students' skills in reading, writing, science and math in grade 10.
  • The CAPT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher11312

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic94%64%
Hispanic3%17%
Black, not Hispanic2%14%
Asian/Pacific Islander<1%4%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%<1%
Student Economic Level
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program110%30%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$11,243$13,277
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional58%62%
Student and staff support10%9%
Administration11%10%
Other expenditures21%18%
Source: NCES, 2006-2007

Back to top >
Tips and Advice by Grade Level
Tips and Advice for Your Kindergartener Tips and Advice for Your First-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Second-Grader
Tips and Advice for Your Third-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Fourth-Grader Tips and Advice for Your Fifth-Grader