Test Scores for Mansfield School District

Find a School

Hot Topic

Choosing a school from a distance

Preschool

Hot Topic

How can I help my preschooler make friends?

Elementary School

Hot Topic

Teaching persistence

Middle School

Hot Topic

When the teacher is the bully

High School

Hot Topic

House rules on drugs and alcohol

College

Hot Topic

Easing college admissions anxiety

Mansfield School District

This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

4 South Eagleville Rd
Storrs, CT 06268
Tolland County
Map >

PH: (860) 429-3350

Grades PK-8
1277 students
4 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:

CMT Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading

83% (2009)

82% (2008)

82% (2007)

87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2009.

Writing

90% (2009)

95% (2008)

85% (2007)

88% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math

96% (2009)

90% (2008)

91% (2007)

87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4

Reading

91% (2009)

81% (2008)

88% (2007)

85% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2009.

Writing

95% (2009)

93% (2008)

90% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2009.

Math

93% (2009)

86% (2008)

90% (2007)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5

Reading

82% (2009)

89% (2008)

81% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2009.

Science

Data not available for this district (2009)

97% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing

89% (2009)

95% (2008)

91% (2007)

86% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 87% in 2009.

Math

88% (2009)

91% (2008)

90% (2007)

89% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6

Reading

88% (2009)

87% (2008)

88% (2007)

87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Writing

91% (2009)

87% (2008)

89% (2007)

89% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2009.

Math

92% (2009)

91% (2008)

93% (2007)

88% (2006)
The state average for Math was 87% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7

Reading

93% (2009)

90% (2008)

89% (2007)

87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 84% in 2009.

Writing

90% (2009)

90% (2008)

92% (2007)

87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 81% in 2009.

Math

93% (2009)

96% (2008)

92% (2007)

88% (2006)
The state average for Math was 86% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8

Reading

92% (2009)

89% (2008)

88% (2007)

93% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2009.

Science

Data not available for this district (2009)

92% (2008)
The state average for Science was n/a in 2009.

Writing

94% (2009)

89% (2008)

91% (2007)

95% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 84% in 2009.

Math

94% (2009)

91% (2008)

90% (2007)

96% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2009.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

CMT Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading	This District
All Students	83%
Female	84%
Male	82%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	85%
Economically disadvantaged	50%
Not economically disadvantaged	89%
Students without disabilities	87%
Not English language learners	83%

Writing	This District
All Students	90%
Female	90%
Male	90%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	92%
Economically disadvantaged	60%
Not economically disadvantaged	96%
Students without disabilities	94%
Not English language learners	91%

Math	This District
All Students	96%
Female	97%
Male	95%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	96%
Economically disadvantaged	90%
Not economically disadvantaged	97%
Students without disabilities	98%
Not English language learners	96%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 4

Reading	This District
All Students	91%
Female	92%
Male	90%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	91%
Economically disadvantaged	92%
Not economically disadvantaged	91%
Students without disabilities	94%
Not English language learners	91%

Writing	This District
All Students	95%
Female	98%
Male	92%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	96%
Economically disadvantaged	89%
Not economically disadvantaged	97%
Students without disabilities	97%
Not English language learners	96%

Math	This District
All Students	93%
Female	90%
Male	95%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	93%
Economically disadvantaged	88%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students without disabilities	96%
Not English language learners	93%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 5

Reading	This District
All Students	82%
Female	77%
Male	88%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	83%
Economically disadvantaged	63%
Not economically disadvantaged	86%
Students without disabilities	87%
Not English language learners	83%

Writing	This District
All Students	89%
Female	90%
Male	88%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	89%
Economically disadvantaged	83%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students without disabilities	92%
Not English language learners	90%

Math	This District
All Students	88%
Female	83%
Male	93%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	88%
Economically disadvantaged	75%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students without disabilities	92%
Not English language learners	88%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 6

Reading	This District
All Students	88%
Female	89%
Male	87%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	90%
Economically disadvantaged	68%
Not economically disadvantaged	93%
Students without disabilities	95%
Not English language learners	89%

Writing	This District
All Students	91%
Female	94%
Male	88%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	92%
Economically disadvantaged	71%
Not economically disadvantaged	96%
Students without disabilities	97%
Not English language learners	91%

Math	This District
All Students	92%
Female	89%
Male	94%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	94%
Economically disadvantaged	79%
Not economically disadvantaged	96%
Students without disabilities	98%
Not English language learners	93%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7

Reading	This District
All Students	93%
Female	93%
Male	93%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	92%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	74%
Students without disabilities	97%
Not English language learners	92%

Writing	This District
All Students	90%
Female	94%
Male	85%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	90%
Not economically disadvantaged	92%
Students with disabilities	60%
Students without disabilities	98%
Not English language learners	90%

Math	This District
All Students	93%
Female	93%
Male	94%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	92%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	71%
Students without disabilities	99%
Not English language learners	93%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8

Reading	This District
All Students	92%
Female	87%
Male	96%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	94%
Not economically disadvantaged	93%
Students with disabilities	63%
Students without disabilities	97%
Not English language learners	93%

Writing	This District
All Students	94%
Female	94%
Male	95%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	94%
Not economically disadvantaged	96%
Students with disabilities	67%
Students without disabilities	99%
Not English language learners	94%

Math	This District
All Students	94%
Female	94%
Male	95%
Black	n/a
Asian American	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
American Indian	n/a
White	96%
Not economically disadvantaged	95%
Students with disabilities	67%
Students without disabilities	99%
Not English language learners	95%

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the Tests

In 2008-2009 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

Teachers

Student-Teacher Ratio

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students per FTE teacher	10	12

How Important is Class Size? >

Students

Student Ethnicity

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
Ethnicity	This District	State Average
White, not Hispanic	79%	64%
Asian/Pacific Islander	11%	4%
Hispanic	6%	17%
Black, not Hispanic	3%	14%
American Indian/Alaskan Native	<1%	<1%

How Important is Cultural Diversity at Your School? >

Student Economic Level

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program	17%	30%

The Achievement Gap: Is Your School Helping All Students? >

Spending Per Pupil

		This District	State Average
Total per pupil expenditures		$16,260	$13,277

Source: NCES, 2006-2007
Breakdown By Expenditure
Instructional	63%	62%
Student and staff support	9%	9%
Administration	11%	10%
Other expenditures	17%	18%

School Finance: Issues to Consider >