Image of globe and book on table

Franklin County Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 5 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

53 West River Road
Louisburg, NC 27549
Franklin County
Map >

PH: (919) 496-2600
FAX: (919) 496-2104

  • Grades PK-7, 9-12
  • 8478 students
  • 15 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:


 EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 66% (2012)
 62% (2011)
 65% (2010)
 62% (2009)
 48% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 69% in 2012.

Math
 81% (2012)
 80% (2011)
 82% (2010)
 79% (2009)
 71% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 62% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 4

Reading
 71% (2012)
 76% (2011)
 72% (2010)
 70% (2009)
 58% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2012.

Math
 86% (2012)
 89% (2011)
 86% (2010)
 82% (2009)
 76% (2008)
 65% (2007)
 56% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 5

Reading
 75% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 70% (2010)
 68% (2009)
 51% (2008)
 91% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2012.

Science
 75% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 68% (2010)
 53% (2009)
 33% (2008)
The state average for Science was 76% in 2012.

Math
 84% (2012)
 82% (2011)
 81% (2010)
 78% (2009)
 69% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 56% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 6

Reading
 80% (2012)
 75% (2011)
 74% (2010)
 68% (2009)
 54% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 75% in 2012.

Math
 80% (2012)
 76% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 74% (2009)
 66% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 51% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 7

Reading
 68% (2012)
 66% (2011)
 64% (2010)
 64% (2009)
 51% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2012.

Math
 79% (2012)
 77% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 79% (2009)
 67% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 54% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 8

Reading
 70% (2012)
 67% (2011)
 69% (2010)
 67% (2009)
 47% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2012.

Science
 75% (2012)
 76% (2011)
 76% (2010)
 74% (2009)
 52% (2008)
The state average for Science was 77% in 2012.

Math
 86% (2012)
 82% (2011)
 82% (2010)
 79% (2009)
 56% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 57% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 10

Reading
Data not available for this district (2012)
 40% (2011)
The state average for Reading was 64% in 2012.

Science
Data not available for this district (2012)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2012.

Writing
 75% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math
Data not available for this district (2012)
 40% (2011)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students66%
Female69%
Male64%
Black54%
Asiann/a
Hispanic50%
Multiracial91%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities24%
Non-disabled students71%
Limited English proficiency42%
Proficient in English69%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students81%
Female82%
Male79%
Black71%
Asiann/a
Hispanic75%
Multiracial91%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged75%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students with disabilities40%
Non-disabled students85%
Limited English proficiency71%
Proficient in English82%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students71%
Female73%
Male68%
Black59%
Asiann/a
Hispanic57%
Multiracial84%
American Indian80%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged64%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students with disabilities34%
Non-disabled students77%
Limited English proficiency25%
Proficient in English74%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students86%
Female87%
Male84%
Black80%
Asiann/a
Hispanic82%
Multiracial80%
American Indian80%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White91%
Economically disadvantaged82%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students with disabilities51%
Non-disabled students92%
Limited English proficiency68%
Proficient in English87%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students75%
Female78%
Male72%
Black63%
Asiann/a
Hispanic72%
Multiracial75%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged69%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities40%
Non-disabled students81%
Limited English proficiency44%
Proficient in English76%
Academically gifted>95%

ScienceThis District
All Students75%
Female75%
Male75%
Black60%
Asiann/a
Hispanic71%
Multiracial71%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White85%
Economically disadvantaged68%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities43%
Non-disabled students80%
Limited English proficiency50%
Proficient in English76%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students84%
Female87%
Male82%
Black76%
Asiann/a
Hispanic81%
Multiracial83%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White90%
Economically disadvantaged79%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students with disabilities49%
Non-disabled students90%
Limited English proficiency50%
Proficient in English85%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students80%
Female81%
Male79%
Black68%
Asiann/a
Hispanic77%
Multiracial78%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students with disabilities59%
Non-disabled students82%
Limited English proficiency39%
Proficient in English81%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students80%
Female84%
Male76%
Black69%
Asiann/a
Hispanic79%
Multiracial74%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students with disabilities39%
Non-disabled students84%
Limited English proficiency39%
Proficient in English81%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students68%
Female70%
Male65%
Black55%
Asiann/a
Hispanic56%
Multiracial70%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White79%
Economically disadvantaged58%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities29%
Non-disabled students72%
Limited English proficiency21%
Proficient in English70%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students79%
Female83%
Male76%
Black70%
Asiann/a
Hispanic75%
Multiracial85%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged72%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students with disabilities49%
Non-disabled students83%
Limited English proficiency45%
Proficient in English81%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students70%
Female72%
Male68%
Black57%
Asiann/a
Hispanic55%
Multiracial71%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged60%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities50%
Non-disabled students72%
Limited English proficiency20%
Proficient in English72%
Academically gifted>95%

ScienceThis District
All Students75%
Female74%
Male77%
Black61%
Asiann/a
Hispanic70%
Multiracial71%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students with disabilities71%
Non-disabled students76%
Limited English proficiency30%
Proficient in English77%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students86%
Female89%
Male83%
Black80%
Asiann/a
Hispanic84%
Multiracial91%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged81%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students with disabilities64%
Non-disabled students88%
Limited English proficiency75%
Proficient in English86%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
Subgroup results not available

ScienceThis District
Subgroup results not available

MathThis District
Subgroup results not available
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

Back to top >
 EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I
 85% (2012)
 81% (2011)
 85% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 79% in 2012.

Algebra II
 80% (2011)
 86% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I
 84% (2012)
 81% (2011)
 83% (2010)
The state average for English I was 83% in 2012.

Biology
 81% (2012)
 77% (2011)
 74% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 83% in 2012.

United States History
 72% (2011)
 69% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science
 78% (2011)
 71% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics
 80% (2011)
 77% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry
 87% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in Algebra I, English I, and Biology.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOC Results By Subgroup

 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient


Algebra IThis District
All Students85%
Female86%
Male84%
Black73%
Asiann/a
Hispanic92%
Multiracial92%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White91%
Economically disadvantaged81%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students with disabilities38%
Non-disabled students90%
Limited English proficiency83%
Proficient in English85%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012


English IThis District
All Students84%
Female90%
Male79%
Black75%
Asiann/a
Hispanic72%
Multiracial93%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White92%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students with disabilities36%
Non-disabled students90%
Limited English proficiency41%
Proficient in English86%
Academically gifted>95%

BiologyThis District
All Students81%
Female83%
Male79%
Black74%
Asiann/a
Hispanic82%
Multiracial80%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White86%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities46%
Non-disabled students84%
Limited English proficiency40%
Proficient in English82%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
  • The results for Algebra I, English I, and Biology are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher11515

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
White, not Hispanic52%54%
Black, not Hispanic36%31%
Hispanic11%11%
Asian/Pacific Islander<1%2%
American Indian/Alaskan Native<1%1%
Student Subgroups
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program151%34%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$7,540$7,954
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional62%63%
Student and staff support10%10%
Administration10%11%
Other expenditures18%17%
Source: NCES, 2006-2007

Back to top >