Test Scores for Mooresville City Schools | GreatSchools

Schools
Articles, Worksheets & More

find a school hot topic

Hot Topic

Choosing a school from a distance

Preschool

preschool hot topic

Hot Topic

How can I help my preschooler make friends?

Elementary School

elementary school hot topic

Hot Topic

Teaching persistence

middle school hot topic

Hot Topic

When the teacher is the bully

High School

high school hot topic

Hot Topic

House rules on drugs and alcohol

College

college hot topic

Hot Topic

Easing college admissions anxiety

Image of globe and book on table

Mooresville City Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 8 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.

This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

EOG Results
EOG Results By Subgroup
EOC Results
EOC Results By Subgroup
Teachers
Students
Spending Per Pupil

305 N Main St
Mooresville, NC 28115
Iredell County
Map >

PH: (704) 658-2530
FAX: (704) 663-3005

District Web site >

Grades PK-12
5420 students
8 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:

EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading

84% (2011)

82% (2010)

71% (2009)

68% (2008)

84% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2011.

Math

>95% (2011)

94% (2010)

90% (2009)

80% (2008)

76% (2007)

84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 4

Reading

80% (2011)

76% (2010)

77% (2009)

67% (2008)

91% (2007)

88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2011.

Math

92% (2011)

88% (2010)

85% (2009)

80% (2008)

76% (2007)

70% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 5

Reading

76% (2011)

78% (2010)

74% (2009)

67% (2008)

93% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2011.

Science

87% (2011)

75% (2010)

68% (2009)

53% (2008)
The state average for Science was 73% in 2011.

Math

91% (2011)

85% (2010)

86% (2009)

77% (2008)

71% (2007)

66% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 6

Reading

85% (2011)

82% (2010)

84% (2009)

71% (2008)

87% (2007)

89% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 75% in 2011.

Math

94% (2011)

91% (2010)

88% (2009)

84% (2008)

76% (2007)

78% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 7

Reading

77% (2011)

81% (2010)

72% (2009)

54% (2008)

88% (2007)

92% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2011.

Math

88% (2011)

90% (2010)

87% (2009)

79% (2008)

75% (2007)

73% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 8

Reading

82% (2011)

80% (2010)

75% (2009)

62% (2008)

94% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2011.

Science

88% (2011)

80% (2010)

81% (2009)

55% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2011.

Math

91% (2011)

94% (2010)

93% (2009)

80% (2008)

79% (2007)

75% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 10

Reading

Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Reading was 67% in 2011.

Writing

76% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math

Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading	This District
All Students	84%
Female	85%
Male	84%
Black	81%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	68%
Multiracial	64%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	88%
Economically disadvantaged	76%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students with disabilities	58%
Non-disabled students	88%
Limited English proficiency	67%
Not limited English proficient	86%

Math	This District
All Students	>95%
Female	>95%
Male	>95%
Black	93%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	95%
Multiracial	93%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	>95%
Economically disadvantaged	94%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	92%
Non-disabled students	>95%
Limited English proficiency	93%
Not limited English proficient	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 4

Reading	This District
All Students	80%
Female	86%
Male	74%
Black	61%
Asian	67%
Hispanic	64%
Multiracial	71%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	85%
Economically disadvantaged	69%
Not economically disadvantaged	87%
Students with disabilities	51%
Non-disabled students	86%
Limited English proficiency	25%
Not limited English proficient	81%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	92%
Female	92%
Male	92%
Black	83%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	86%
Multiracial	82%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	94%
Economically disadvantaged	86%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	78%
Non-disabled students	95%
Limited English proficiency	67%
Not limited English proficient	93%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 5

Reading	This District
All Students	76%
Female	83%
Male	69%
Black	50%
Asian	60%
Hispanic	79%
Multiracial	56%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	82%
Economically disadvantaged	62%
Not economically disadvantaged	85%
Students with disabilities	53%
Non-disabled students	79%
Limited English proficiency	67%
Not limited English proficient	76%
Academically gifted	>95%

Science	This District
All Students	87%
Female	84%
Male	89%
Black	64%
Asian	83%
Hispanic	79%
Multiracial	67%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	92%
Economically disadvantaged	73%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	80%
Non-disabled students	87%
Limited English proficiency	57%
Not limited English proficient	87%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	91%
Female	92%
Male	91%
Black	83%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	90%
Multiracial	56%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	94%
Economically disadvantaged	85%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	78%
Non-disabled students	93%
Limited English proficiency	71%
Not limited English proficient	92%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 6

Reading	This District
All Students	85%
Female	84%
Male	86%
Black	64%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	75%
Multiracial	75%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	90%
Economically disadvantaged	73%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	68%
Non-disabled students	88%
Limited English proficiency	25%
Not limited English proficient	86%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	94%
Female	>95%
Male	92%
Black	85%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	92%
Multiracial	83%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	>95%
Economically disadvantaged	87%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	85%
Non-disabled students	>95%
Limited English proficiency	88%
Not limited English proficient	94%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 7

Reading	This District
All Students	77%
Female	81%
Male	74%
Black	54%
Asian	60%
Hispanic	66%
Multiracial	72%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	84%
Economically disadvantaged	64%
Not economically disadvantaged	87%
Students with disabilities	58%
Non-disabled students	80%
Limited English proficiency	39%
Not limited English proficient	79%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	88%
Female	90%
Male	87%
Black	79%
Asian	80%
Hispanic	82%
Multiracial	89%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	91%
Economically disadvantaged	80%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	75%
Non-disabled students	90%
Limited English proficiency	62%
Not limited English proficient	89%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 8

Reading	This District
All Students	82%
Female	88%
Male	75%
Black	71%
Asian	88%
Hispanic	68%
Multiracial	70%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	85%
Economically disadvantaged	72%
Not economically disadvantaged	88%
Students with disabilities	71%
Non-disabled students	83%
Limited English proficiency	46%
Not limited English proficient	83%
Academically gifted	>95%

Science	This District
All Students	88%
Female	91%
Male	86%
Black	71%
Asian	88%
Hispanic	72%
Multiracial	80%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	93%
Economically disadvantaged	79%
Not economically disadvantaged	95%
Students with disabilities	87%
Non-disabled students	89%
Limited English proficiency	46%
Not limited English proficient	90%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	91%
Female	94%
Male	89%
Black	89%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	88%
Multiracial	90%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	92%
Economically disadvantaged	88%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	84%
Non-disabled students	92%
Limited English proficiency	82%
Not limited English proficient	92%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 10

Reading	This District
Subgroup results not available

Writing	This District
All Students	76%
Female	82%
Male	71%
Black	48%
Asian	86%
Hispanic	50%
Multiracial	86%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	82%
Economically disadvantaged	57%
Not economically disadvantaged	85%
Students with disabilities	27%
Non-disabled students	83%
Limited English proficiency	40%
Not limited English proficient	77%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
Subgroup results not available

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I

87% (2011)

87% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 77% in 2011.

Algebra II

>95% (2011)

>95% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I

91% (2011)

87% (2010)
The state average for English I was 81% in 2011.

Biology

94% (2011)

91% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 80% in 2011.

United States History

89% (2011)

81% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science

89% (2011)

92% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics

62% (2011)

83% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry

95% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, and economics.
The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

EOC Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I	This District
All Students	87%
Female	88%
Male	86%
Black	76%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	85%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	89%
Economically disadvantaged	78%
Not economically disadvantaged	92%
Students with disabilities	46%
Non-disabled students	91%
Not limited English proficient	87%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Algebra II	This District
All Students	>95%
Female	>95%
Male	>95%
Black	91%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	>95%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	>95%
Economically disadvantaged	>95%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	83%
Non-disabled students	>95%
Not limited English proficient	>95%

English I	This District
All Students	91%
Female	92%
Male	90%
Black	84%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	83%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	93%
Economically disadvantaged	85%
Not economically disadvantaged	94%
Students with disabilities	46%
Non-disabled students	>95%
Not limited English proficient	91%

Biology	This District
All Students	94%
Female	94%
Male	94%
Black	79%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	88%
Multiracial	89%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	>95%
Economically disadvantaged	86%
Not economically disadvantaged	>95%
Students with disabilities	71%
Non-disabled students	>95%
Not limited English proficient	94%
Academically gifted	>95%

United States History	This District
All Students	89%
Female	89%
Male	89%
Black	72%
Asian	>95%
Hispanic	72%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	95%
Economically disadvantaged	79%
Not economically disadvantaged	95%
Students with disabilities	65%
Non-disabled students	91%
Not limited English proficient	90%
Academically gifted	>95%

Physical Science	This District
All Students	89%
Female	86%
Male	91%
Black	72%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	>95%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	95%
Economically disadvantaged	85%
Not economically disadvantaged	92%
Students with disabilities	84%
Non-disabled students	89%
Not limited English proficient	89%

Civics and Economics	This District
All Students	62%
Female	57%
Male	64%
Black	50%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	n/a
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	67%
Economically disadvantaged	69%
Not economically disadvantaged	56%
Students with disabilities	30%
Non-disabled students	79%
Not limited English proficient	62%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
The results for algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, economics, and geometry are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Teachers

Student-Teacher Ratio

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students per FTE teacher	16	15

How Important is Class Size? >

Students

Student Ethnicity

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
Ethnicity	This District	State Average
White, not Hispanic	74%	54%
Black, not Hispanic	18%	31%
Hispanic	6%	11%
Asian/Pacific Islander	2%	2%
American Indian/Alaskan Native	<1%	1%

How Important is Cultural Diversity at Your School? >

Student Subgroups

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program	32%	34%

The Achievement Gap: Is Your School Helping All Students? >

Spending Per Pupil

Spending Per Pupil

Information about this data

		This District	State Average
Total per pupil expenditures		$7,167	$7,954

Source: NCES, 2006-2007
Breakdown By Expenditure
Instructional	64%	63%
Student and staff support	9%	10%
Administration	11%	11%
Other expenditures	17%	17%

School Finance: Issues to Consider >

Tips and Advice by Grade Level