Test Scores for Yadkin County Schools | GreatSchools

Schools
Articles, Worksheets & More

find a school hot topic

Hot Topic

Choosing a school from a distance

Preschool

preschool hot topic

Hot Topic

How can I help my preschooler make friends?

Elementary School

elementary school hot topic

Hot Topic

Teaching persistence

middle school hot topic

Hot Topic

When the teacher is the bully

High School

high school hot topic

Hot Topic

House rules on drugs and alcohol

College

college hot topic

Hot Topic

Easing college admissions anxiety

Image of globe and book on table

Yadkin County Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 6 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.

This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

EOG Results
EOG Results By Subgroup
EOC Results
EOC Results By Subgroup
Teachers
Students
Spending Per Pupil

121 Washington St
Yadkinville, NC 27055
Yadkin County
Map >

PH: (336) 679-2051
FAX: (336) 679-4013

District Web site >

Grades PK-12
5805 students
14 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:

EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading

68% (2011)

66% (2010)

68% (2009)

59% (2008)

80% (2007)

78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2011.

Math

86% (2011)

83% (2010)

84% (2009)

74% (2008)

72% (2007)

63% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 4

Reading

67% (2011)

75% (2010)

68% (2009)

60% (2008)

83% (2007)

82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2011.

Math

79% (2011)

81% (2010)

81% (2009)

71% (2008)

65% (2007)

62% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 5

Reading

73% (2011)

74% (2010)

65% (2009)

54% (2008)

89% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2011.

Science

74% (2011)

71% (2010)

66% (2009)

37% (2008)
The state average for Science was 73% in 2011.

Math

82% (2011)

82% (2010)

79% (2009)

70% (2008)

66% (2007)

64% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 6

Reading

79% (2011)

79% (2010)

69% (2009)

57% (2008)

86% (2007)

86% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 75% in 2011.

Math

90% (2011)

85% (2010)

84% (2009)

72% (2008)

72% (2007)

69% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 7

Reading

63% (2011)

61% (2010)

61% (2009)

49% (2008)

87% (2007)

90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2011.

Math

76% (2011)

78% (2010)

76% (2009)

68% (2008)

61% (2007)

64% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 8

Reading

63% (2011)

65% (2010)

66% (2009)

54% (2008)

89% (2007)

91% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2011.

Science

77% (2011)

73% (2010)

71% (2009)

54% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2011.

Math

84% (2011)

88% (2010)

79% (2009)

67% (2008)

70% (2007)

63% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 10

Reading

Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Reading was 67% in 2011.

Writing

61% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math

Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2011.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading	This District
All Students	68%
Female	74%
Male	63%
Black	79%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	52%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	73%
Economically disadvantaged	63%
Not economically disadvantaged	77%
Students with disabilities	42%
Non-disabled students	72%
Limited English proficiency	44%
Not limited English proficient	74%

Math	This District
All Students	86%
Female	87%
Male	85%
Black	93%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	81%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	88%
Economically disadvantaged	82%
Not economically disadvantaged	92%
Students with disabilities	66%
Non-disabled students	89%
Limited English proficiency	77%
Not limited English proficient	88%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 4

Reading	This District
All Students	67%
Female	71%
Male	63%
Black	57%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	44%
Multiracial	75%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	74%
Economically disadvantaged	55%
Not economically disadvantaged	80%
Students with disabilities	40%
Non-disabled students	70%
Limited English proficiency	22%
Not limited English proficient	72%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	79%
Female	79%
Male	79%
Black	64%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	65%
Multiracial	38%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	84%
Economically disadvantaged	71%
Not economically disadvantaged	88%
Students with disabilities	57%
Non-disabled students	82%
Limited English proficiency	47%
Not limited English proficient	83%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 5

Reading	This District
All Students	73%
Female	76%
Male	71%
Black	75%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	54%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	78%
Economically disadvantaged	62%
Not economically disadvantaged	86%
Students with disabilities	42%
Non-disabled students	77%
Limited English proficiency	19%
Not limited English proficient	78%
Academically gifted	>95%

Science	This District
All Students	74%
Female	71%
Male	76%
Black	58%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	48%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	82%
Economically disadvantaged	63%
Not economically disadvantaged	86%
Students with disabilities	50%
Non-disabled students	77%
Limited English proficiency	25%
Not limited English proficient	78%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	82%
Female	81%
Male	82%
Black	71%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	71%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	86%
Economically disadvantaged	75%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students with disabilities	58%
Non-disabled students	85%
Limited English proficiency	50%
Not limited English proficient	85%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 6

Reading	This District
All Students	79%
Female	79%
Male	78%
Black	60%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	70%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	81%
Economically disadvantaged	72%
Not economically disadvantaged	87%
Students with disabilities	46%
Non-disabled students	83%
Limited English proficiency	50%
Not limited English proficient	81%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	90%
Female	90%
Male	89%
Black	80%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	87%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	91%
Economically disadvantaged	86%
Not economically disadvantaged	95%
Students with disabilities	68%
Non-disabled students	92%
Limited English proficiency	69%
Not limited English proficient	91%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 7

Reading	This District
All Students	63%
Female	65%
Male	61%
Black	67%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	40%
Multiracial	86%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	67%
Economically disadvantaged	56%
Not economically disadvantaged	70%
Students with disabilities	26%
Non-disabled students	68%
Limited English proficiency	16%
Not limited English proficient	66%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	76%
Female	81%
Male	72%
Black	89%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	68%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	77%
Economically disadvantaged	72%
Not economically disadvantaged	81%
Students with disabilities	44%
Non-disabled students	80%
Limited English proficiency	44%
Not limited English proficient	78%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 8

Reading	This District
All Students	63%
Female	68%
Male	59%
Black	41%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	50%
Multiracial	60%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	67%
Economically disadvantaged	51%
Not economically disadvantaged	74%
Students with disabilities	15%
Non-disabled students	69%
Limited English proficiency	19%
Not limited English proficient	66%
Academically gifted	>95%

Science	This District
All Students	77%
Female	74%
Male	78%
Black	71%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	69%
Multiracial	80%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	79%
Economically disadvantaged	70%
Not economically disadvantaged	83%
Students with disabilities	43%
Non-disabled students	81%
Limited English proficiency	44%
Not limited English proficient	79%
Academically gifted	>95%

Math	This District
All Students	84%
Female	87%
Male	82%
Black	88%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	85%
Multiracial	80%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	84%
Economically disadvantaged	78%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students with disabilities	50%
Non-disabled students	89%
Limited English proficiency	72%
Not limited English proficient	85%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Grade 10

Reading	This District
Subgroup results not available

Writing	This District
All Students	61%
Female	70%
Male	53%
Black	61%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	52%
Multiracial	50%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	62%
Economically disadvantaged	55%
Not economically disadvantaged	65%
Students with disabilities	17%
Non-disabled students	65%
Limited English proficiency	7%
Not limited English proficient	63%
Academically gifted	89%

Math	This District
Subgroup results not available

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I

77% (2011)

83% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 77% in 2011.

Algebra II

81% (2011)

86% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I

81% (2011)

83% (2010)
The state average for English I was 81% in 2011.

Biology

87% (2011)

86% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 80% in 2011.

United States History

88% (2011)

90% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science

85% (2011)

72% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics

84% (2011)

81% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry

81% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, and economics.
The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

EOC Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I	This District
All Students	77%
Female	79%
Male	76%
Black	58%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	71%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	79%
Economically disadvantaged	72%
Not economically disadvantaged	83%
Students with disabilities	37%
Non-disabled students	82%
Limited English proficiency	41%
Not limited English proficient	80%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

Algebra II	This District
All Students	81%
Female	80%
Male	81%
Black	58%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	82%
Multiracial	67%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	82%
Economically disadvantaged	78%
Not economically disadvantaged	82%
Students with disabilities	43%
Non-disabled students	82%
Limited English proficiency	75%
Not limited English proficient	81%
Academically gifted	>95%

English I	This District
All Students	81%
Female	87%
Male	77%
Black	67%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	68%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	84%
Economically disadvantaged	73%
Not economically disadvantaged	89%
Students with disabilities	27%
Non-disabled students	88%
Limited English proficiency	33%
Not limited English proficient	85%
Academically gifted	>95%

Biology	This District
All Students	87%
Female	89%
Male	86%
Black	74%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	76%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	90%
Economically disadvantaged	81%
Not economically disadvantaged	92%
Students with disabilities	49%
Non-disabled students	91%
Limited English proficiency	45%
Not limited English proficient	89%
Academically gifted	>95%

United States History	This District
All Students	88%
Female	84%
Male	91%
Black	64%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	73%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	91%
Economically disadvantaged	81%
Not economically disadvantaged	91%
Students with disabilities	70%
Non-disabled students	89%
Limited English proficiency	60%
Not limited English proficient	89%
Academically gifted	>95%

Physical Science	This District
All Students	85%
Female	80%
Male	88%
Black	63%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	73%
Multiracial	n/a
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	88%
Economically disadvantaged	81%
Not economically disadvantaged	87%
Students with disabilities	69%
Non-disabled students	87%
Limited English proficiency	56%
Not limited English proficient	87%
Academically gifted	>95%

Civics and Economics	This District
All Students	84%
Female	86%
Male	83%
Black	79%
Asian	n/a
Hispanic	72%
Multiracial	>95%
American Indian	n/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander	n/a
White	86%
Economically disadvantaged	76%
Not economically disadvantaged	90%
Students with disabilities	49%
Non-disabled students	87%
Limited English proficiency	33%
Not limited English proficient	86%
Academically gifted	>95%

Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011

About the Tests

In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
The results for algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, economics, and geometry are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Teachers

Student-Teacher Ratio

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students per FTE teacher	15	15

How Important is Class Size? >

Students

Student Ethnicity

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
Ethnicity	This District	State Average
White, not Hispanic	77%	54%
Hispanic	16%	11%
Black, not Hispanic	5%	31%
Asian/Pacific Islander	<1%	2%
American Indian/Alaskan Native	<1%	1%

How Important is Cultural Diversity at Your School? >

Student Subgroups

Information about this data

Source: NCES, 2008-2009
	This District	State Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program	43%	34%

The Achievement Gap: Is Your School Helping All Students? >

Spending Per Pupil

Spending Per Pupil

Information about this data

		This District	State Average
Total per pupil expenditures		$7,462	$7,954

Source: NCES, 2006-2007
Breakdown By Expenditure
Instructional	61%	63%
Student and staff support	10%	10%
Administration	10%	11%
Other expenditures	18%	17%

School Finance: Issues to Consider >

Tips and Advice by Grade Level