Image of globe and book on table

Bladen County Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 3 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

1489 US Hwy 701 South
Elizabethtown, NC 28337
Bladen County
Map >

PH: (910) 862-4136
FAX: (910) 862-4277

  • Grades PK-12
  • 5002 students
  • 13 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:


 EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 57% (2012)
 61% (2011)
 56% (2010)
 54% (2009)
 43% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 69% in 2012.

Math
 75% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 70% (2010)
 73% (2009)
 66% (2008)
 68% (2007)
 57% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 4

Reading
 62% (2012)
 62% (2011)
 64% (2010)
 63% (2009)
 55% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 73% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2012.

Math
 76% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 73% (2009)
 66% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 47% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 5

Reading
 59% (2012)
 59% (2011)
 60% (2010)
 66% (2009)
 45% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 72% in 2012.

Science
 69% (2012)
 67% (2011)
 66% (2010)
 66% (2009)
 34% (2008)
The state average for Science was 76% in 2012.

Math
 65% (2012)
 66% (2011)
 69% (2010)
 75% (2009)
 56% (2008)
 49% (2007)
 42% (2006)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 6

Reading
 62% (2012)
 68% (2011)
 68% (2010)
 63% (2009)
 47% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 75% in 2012.

Math
 65% (2012)
 65% (2011)
 77% (2010)
 78% (2009)
 64% (2008)
 52% (2007)
 53% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 7

Reading
 55% (2012)
 60% (2011)
 55% (2010)
 58% (2009)
 39% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2012.

Math
 66% (2012)
 78% (2011)
 73% (2010)
 74% (2009)
 60% (2008)
 60% (2007)
 54% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 8

Reading
 61% (2012)
 56% (2011)
 56% (2010)
 54% (2009)
 41% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 71% in 2012.

Science
 73% (2012)
 63% (2011)
 65% (2010)
 58% (2009)
 42% (2008)
The state average for Science was 77% in 2012.

Math
 80% (2012)
 76% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 75% (2009)
 60% (2008)
 51% (2007)
 43% (2006)
The state average for Math was 85% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 10

Reading
 67% (2012)
 50% (2011)
The state average for Reading was 64% in 2012.

Science
 67% (2012)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2012.

Writing
 42% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math
 67% (2012)
 50% (2011)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students57%
Female64%
Male51%
Black51%
Asiann/a
Hispanic47%
Multiracial56%
American Indian78%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White66%
Economically disadvantaged51%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disabilities21%
Non-disabled students62%
Limited English proficiency44%
Proficient in English59%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students75%
Female78%
Male72%
Black70%
Asiann/a
Hispanic70%
Multiracial83%
American Indian89%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities36%
Non-disabled students81%
Limited English proficiency64%
Proficient in English77%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students62%
Female67%
Male58%
Black51%
Asiann/a
Hispanic60%
Multiracial68%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities31%
Non-disabled students66%
Limited English proficiency31%
Proficient in English65%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students76%
Female80%
Male73%
Black72%
Asiann/a
Hispanic74%
Multiracial77%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged74%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities47%
Non-disabled students80%
Limited English proficiency52%
Proficient in English78%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students59%
Female65%
Male53%
Black49%
Asiann/a
Hispanic57%
Multiracial56%
American Indian75%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White69%
Economically disadvantaged52%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disabilities11%
Non-disabled students64%
Limited English proficiency29%
Proficient in English61%
Academically gifted>95%

ScienceThis District
All Students69%
Female70%
Male68%
Black59%
Asiann/a
Hispanic69%
Multiracial78%
American Indian75%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White77%
Economically disadvantaged63%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students with disabilities33%
Non-disabled students72%
Limited English proficiency43%
Proficient in English71%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students65%
Female67%
Male63%
Black55%
Asiann/a
Hispanic72%
Multiracial67%
American Indian75%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White71%
Economically disadvantaged58%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities28%
Non-disabled students69%
Limited English proficiency57%
Proficient in English66%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students62%
Female67%
Male57%
Black46%
Asiann/a
Hispanic66%
Multiracial62%
American Indian67%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White75%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities27%
Non-disabled students67%
Limited English proficiency31%
Proficient in English63%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students65%
Female70%
Male61%
Black56%
Asiann/a
Hispanic67%
Multiracial77%
American Indian78%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White72%
Economically disadvantaged60%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities35%
Non-disabled students69%
Limited English proficiency44%
Proficient in English66%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students55%
Female60%
Male50%
Black46%
Asiann/a
Hispanic50%
Multiracial53%
American Indian50%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White65%
Economically disadvantaged48%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities20%
Non-disabled students59%
Limited English proficiency14%
Proficient in English56%
Academically gifted92%

MathThis District
All Students66%
Female71%
Male62%
Black58%
Asiann/a
Hispanic77%
Multiracial>95%
American Indian83%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White67%
Economically disadvantaged62%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disabilities33%
Non-disabled students70%
Limited English proficiency57%
Proficient in English67%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students61%
Female64%
Male58%
Black53%
Asiann/a
Hispanic48%
Multiracial60%
American Indian71%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White72%
Economically disadvantaged56%
Not economically disadvantaged77%
Students with disabilities20%
Non-disabled students66%
Limited English proficiency<5%
Proficient in English62%
Academically gifted94%

ScienceThis District
All Students73%
Female77%
Male69%
Black62%
Asiann/a
Hispanic68%
Multiracial76%
American Indian86%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged68%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students with disabilities38%
Non-disabled students77%
Limited English proficiency25%
Proficient in English74%
Academically gifted>95%

MathThis District
All Students80%
Female81%
Male78%
Black74%
Asiann/a
Hispanic83%
Multiracial84%
American Indian86%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White83%
Economically disadvantaged77%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities48%
Non-disabled students83%
Limited English proficiency63%
Proficient in English80%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

Grade 10
ReadingThis District
All Students67%
Male60%
Blackn/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disabilities67%
Proficient in English67%

ScienceThis District
All Students67%
Male60%
Blackn/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disabilities67%
Proficient in English67%

MathThis District
All Students67%
Male60%
Blackn/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disabilities67%
Proficient in English67%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

Back to top >
 EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Algebra I
 62% (2012)
 64% (2011)
 61% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 79% in 2012.

Algebra II
 88% (2011)
 78% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I
 76% (2012)
 65% (2011)
 63% (2010)
The state average for English I was 83% in 2012.

Biology
 78% (2012)
 78% (2011)
 66% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 83% in 2012.

United States History
 72% (2011)
 65% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science
 74% (2011)
 71% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics
 81% (2011)
 60% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry
 65% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in Algebra I, English I, and Biology.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOC Results By Subgroup

 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient


Algebra IThis District
All Students62%
Female63%
Male61%
Black59%
Asiann/a
Hispanic67%
Multiracial63%
American Indian>95%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White63%
Economically disadvantaged58%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students with disabilities26%
Non-disabled students67%
Limited English proficiency65%
Proficient in English62%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012


English IThis District
All Students76%
Female84%
Male70%
Black71%
Asiann/a
Hispanic71%
Multiracial93%
American Indian67%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities32%
Non-disabled students81%
Limited English proficiency47%
Proficient in English78%
Academically gifted>95%

BiologyThis District
All Students78%
Female84%
Male72%
Black66%
Asiann/a
Hispanic83%
Multiracial82%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged90%
Students with disabilities28%
Non-disabled students86%
Limited English proficiency38%
Proficient in English79%
Academically gifted>95%
Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
  • The results for Algebra I, English I, and Biology are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Student-Teacher Ratio
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students per FTE teacher11415

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
Black, not Hispanic47%31%
White, not Hispanic42%54%
Hispanic10%11%
American Indian/Alaskan Native2%1%
Asian/Pacific Islander<1%2%
Student Subgroups
Information about this data
Source: 1NCES, 2008-2009
 This DistrictState Average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program166%34%

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 
Spending Per Pupil
Information about this data
 This DistrictState Average
Total per pupil expenditures$8,573$7,954
Breakdown By Expenditure  
Instructional58%63%
Student and staff support11%10%
Administration13%11%
Other expenditures19%17%
Source: NCES, 2006-2007

Back to top >