Image of globe and book on table

Davie County Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 7 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

220 Cherry St
Mocksville, NC 27028
Davie County
Map >

PH: (336) 751-5921
FAX: (336) 751-9013

  • Grades K-12
  • 6429 students
  • 12 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:


 EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 52% (2013)
 75% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 75% (2010)
 77% (2009)
 61% (2008)
 86% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 45% in 2013.

Math
 52% (2013)
 88% (2012)
 89% (2011)
 89% (2010)
 91% (2009)
 83% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Math was 47% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 4

Reading
 53% (2013)
 83% (2012)
 81% (2011)
 83% (2010)
 75% (2009)
 66% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 44% in 2013.

Math
 53% (2013)
 91% (2012)
 90% (2011)
 91% (2010)
 87% (2009)
 78% (2008)
 72% (2007)
 66% (2006)
The state average for Math was 48% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 5

Reading
 48% (2013)
 83% (2012)
 85% (2011)
 84% (2010)
 79% (2009)
 64% (2008)
 92% (2007)
 89% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 40% in 2013.

Science
 43% (2013)
 77% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 79% (2010)
 73% (2009)
 53% (2008)
The state average for Science was 45% in 2013.

Math
 53% (2013)
 87% (2012)
 91% (2011)
 93% (2010)
 88% (2009)
 81% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Math was 48% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 6

Reading
 56% (2013)
 87% (2012)
 86% (2011)
 82% (2010)
 78% (2009)
 65% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 46% in 2013.

Math
 54% (2013)
 91% (2012)
 92% (2011)
 91% (2010)
 87% (2009)
 73% (2008)
 71% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Math was 39% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 7

Reading
 57% (2013)
 83% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 69% (2009)
 57% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 92% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 48% in 2013.

Math
 47% (2013)
 93% (2012)
 91% (2011)
 86% (2010)
 79% (2009)
 70% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Math was 39% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 8

Reading
 52% (2013)
 80% (2012)
 80% (2011)
 78% (2010)
 71% (2009)
 68% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 92% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 41% in 2013.

Science
 74% (2013)
 87% (2012)
 87% (2011)
 83% (2010)
 78% (2009)
 69% (2008)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2013.

Math
 49% (2013)
 92% (2012)
 92% (2011)
 90% (2010)
 86% (2009)
 85% (2008)
 80% (2007)
 75% (2006)
The state average for Math was 34% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 10

Reading
Data not available for this district (2012)
Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Reading was 64% in 2012.

Science
Data not available for this district (2012)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2012.

Writing
 67% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math
Data not available for this district (2012)
Data not available for this district (2011)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students52%
Female52%
Male53%
Black20%
Asiann/a
Hispanic40%
Multiracial47%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White57%
Economically disadvantaged37%
Not economically disadvantaged69%
Students with disabilities21%
Non-disabled students56%
Limited English proficiency21%
Proficient in English54%
Non-migrant52%

MathThis District
All Students52%
Female49%
Male54%
Black30%
Asiann/a
Hispanic49%
Multiracial47%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White54%
Economically disadvantaged39%
Not economically disadvantaged65%
Students with disabilities14%
Non-disabled students56%
Limited English proficiency31%
Proficient in English53%
Non-migrant52%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students53%
Female55%
Male52%
Black33%
Asiann/a
Hispanic34%
Multiracial53%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White58%
Economically disadvantaged38%
Not economically disadvantaged68%
Students with disabilities14%
Non-disabled students60%
Limited English proficiency12%
Proficient in English56%
Non-migrant53%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students53%
Female53%
Male54%
Black36%
Asiann/a
Hispanic39%
Multiracial37%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White58%
Economically disadvantaged37%
Not economically disadvantaged69%
Students with disabilities18%
Non-disabled students60%
Limited English proficiency8%
Proficient in English56%
Non-migrant53%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students48%
Female52%
Male45%
Black33%
Asiann/a
Hispanic29%
Multiracial41%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White53%
Economically disadvantaged33%
Not economically disadvantaged63%
Students with disabilities11%
Non-disabled students54%
Limited English proficiency9%
Proficient in English50%
Non-migrant48%
Academically gifted94%

ScienceThis District
All Students43%
Female42%
Male44%
Black21%
Asiann/a
Hispanic29%
Multiracial27%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White48%
Economically disadvantaged28%
Not economically disadvantaged57%
Students with disabilities10%
Non-disabled students48%
Limited English proficiency14%
Proficient in English44%
Non-migrant43%
Academically gifted93%

MathThis District
All Students53%
Female54%
Male52%
Black36%
Asiann/a
Hispanic40%
Multiracial36%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White57%
Economically disadvantaged38%
Not economically disadvantaged66%
Students with disabilities17%
Non-disabled students59%
Limited English proficiency23%
Proficient in English54%
Non-migrant53%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students56%
Female60%
Male52%
Black46%
Asiann/a
Hispanic29%
Multiracial26%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White62%
Economically disadvantaged39%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students with disabilities10%
Non-disabled students63%
Limited English proficiency-4%
Proficient in English58%
Non-migrant56%
Academically gifted94%

MathThis District
All Students54%
Female58%
Male49%
Black39%
Asiann/a
Hispanic30%
Multiracial32%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White59%
Economically disadvantaged40%
Not economically disadvantaged67%
Students with disabilities-4%
Non-disabled students61%
Limited English proficiency8%
Proficient in English55%
Non-migrant54%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students57%
Female59%
Male55%
Black21%
Asiann/a
Hispanic36%
Multiracial44%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White62%
Economically disadvantaged40%
Not economically disadvantaged71%
Students with disabilities13%
Non-disabled students63%
Proficient in English58%
Non-migrant57%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students47%
Female48%
Male47%
Black25%
Asiann/a
Hispanic32%
Multiracial39%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White51%
Economically disadvantaged32%
Not economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disabilities11%
Non-disabled students52%
Proficient in English48%
Non-migrant47%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students52%
Female60%
Male46%
Black39%
Asiann/a
Hispanic35%
Multiracial37%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White57%
Economically disadvantaged35%
Not economically disadvantaged66%
Students with disabilities8%
Non-disabled students60%
Limited English proficiency8%
Proficient in English53%
Non-migrant52%
Academically gifted94%

ScienceThis District
All Students74%
Female71%
Male76%
Black57%
Asiann/a
Hispanic51%
Multiracial70%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White78%
Economically disadvantaged62%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students with disabilities38%
Non-disabled students80%
Limited English proficiency17%
Proficient in English75%
Non-migrant74%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students49%
Female49%
Male49%
Black21%
Asiann/a
Hispanic21%
Multiracial33%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White56%
Economically disadvantaged29%
Not economically disadvantaged64%
Students with disabilities7%
Non-disabled students56%
Limited English proficiency-4%
Proficient in English50%
Non-migrant49%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

Back to top >
 EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

English II
 61% (2013)
The state average for English II was 51% in 2013.

Biology
 53% (2013)
The state average for Biology was 46% in 2013.

Algebra I
 47% (2013)
 84% (2012)
 81% (2011)
 88% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 36% in 2013.

Algebra II
 91% (2011)
 82% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I
 89% (2012)
 84% (2011)
 84% (2010)
The state average for English I was 83% in 2012.

Biology
 84% (2012)
 82% (2011)
 92% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 83% in 2012.

United States History
 85% (2011)
 87% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science
 88% (2011)
 77% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics
 88% (2011)
 88% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry
 90% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in Algebra I, English I, and Biology.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOC Results By Subgroup

 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient


English IIThis District
All Students61%
Female68%
Male54%
Black27%
Asiann/a
Hispanic36%
Multiracial41%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White66%
Economically disadvantaged41%
Not economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disabilities17%
Non-disabled students66%
Proficient in English62%
Non-migrant61%
Academically gifted-94%

BiologyThis District
All Students53%
Female57%
Male49%
Black11%
Asiann/a
Hispanic28%
Multiracial38%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White60%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Not economically disadvantaged67%
Students with disabilities18%
Non-disabled students58%
Proficient in English54%
Non-migrant53%
Academically gifted94%

Algebra IThis District
All Students47%
Female48%
Male47%
Black34%
Asiann/a
Hispanic29%
Multiracial36%
American Indiann/a
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White51%
Economically disadvantaged25%
Not economically disadvantaged62%
Students with disabilities9%
Non-disabled students52%
Limited English proficiency15%
Proficient in English48%
Non-migrant47%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
  • The results for Algebra I, English I, and Biology are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Teacher data was not reported for this district.

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source:
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
Unspecified100%n/a

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 

Finance data was not reported for this district.

Back to top >