Advertisement

Home > Elementary School > Elementary School Community

dual language school vs better rated school


Avatar
 

jhjohnson May 27, 2012


The Question must begin with the question, What Language and what will that language do for my child? Taking a language in a k-12 school usually will not result in anyone becoming fluent in that language but more importantly; what will Latin do for my child if they can't read, what good is French, Greek, or any language not related to a student's needs or goals. It may be enlightning but not at the expense of a better education. Let the child wait until they have a goal that warrants a 2nd language or they are learned enough to take a language relavant to their needs or a career goal. JHJ WPHS Class of 66

Post a reply
Facebook  Digg 

Replies

Sort by:  Oldest first |  Newest first 


Avatar
  

de-medeiros May 27, 2012


I take the opposite view. Dual-language schools cannot be directly compared with language course offered in a school where general instruction is given in a single language. Fluency comes from immersion and usage of both languages in a dual-language school setting.

There's conclusive research that bilingual students do better in reading comprehension and language skills than single-language students, and tend to do better academically in general. Also ratings are far from the only means to measure the quality of a school. Often ratings mean little for each student. For instance, we have schools rated 4/10 in greatschools.org that rate 10/10 when you concentrate on a sub-population of the student body such as those with college-educated parents.

2nd-language skills are no longer a luxury in the global economy we live in. I think the opportunity to educate your child in two languages should not be dismissed lightly.



Search Community

ADVERTISEMENT