Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Robeson Academy

Public | K-8 | 564 students

Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars


Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

5 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted August 4, 2008

Many caring faculty members that are very genuine, however, as a parent I think many things could stand to improve such as safety of parking lot where students are dropped to/from school and the intolerance of children just being children.I believe they are expected to act abnormally mature for the age groups around 8-10 yrs. Children that age are just not able to sit completely still for eight hours straight.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 25, 2007

I am currently attending my 8th grade year at Paul Robeson and loving every minute of it! My teachers are so supportive, and challenging. The principle and assistant principle are excellent and coordinated. I have been attending the school ever since 5th grade, and it has provided a fun, academically challenging environment. My teachers strive to develop a student-teacher relationship. I only wish more parents would put more effort in this. I feel like hugging every teacher I have! The principle too! I wouldn't switch my school for anything. I know I will never have such great teachers or principle any where else. All though there are a few negative areas. About four of the elementary teachers are uncoordinated. Plus parents really need to get more involved. But for the overall performance of the school, I give it five stars hands down!
—Submitted by a student


Posted August 3, 2007

My children completed their 1st and last year at this school and it was a horrible experience. The teachers or principles have little to no control of themselves or their students. I strongly caution against enrolling your child in this school. There are actually some great teachers and staff that work there but not enough to make a difference! It was such a disappointment as I had heard so many high praises about this school.
—Submitted by Clarice, a parent


Posted January 26, 2005

My child has attended PRA for 4 years. At the beginning of the school year there were 42 children in his 4th grade classroom. There has been a serious decline in the quality of this school. Overall, teachers are concerned and there are quite a few good ones, but there is not enough checks & balances within the system to ensure quality education is being taught. Some teachers have admitted there's no time to 'help' a failing student because they're too busy 'teaching'. Principal and Vice-Principal have a serious communication gap. Vice-Principal has instituted a 'no-talking' policy in the lunchroom and violators have gotten up to 5-day suspensions. No structured outlet for the kids (usually no recess, no playground equipment). Fighting has increased. Parental involvement is virtually non-existent. Morale among staff, students, and parents is way down! Paul Robeson is surely turning over in his grave!
—Submitted by Arlyssa Heard-Phillips, a parent


Posted January 15, 2005

I am a student currently attending Paul Robeson Academy. I enjoy attending this although it has many flaws, like other schools. Along with its flaws, it does have its advantages, like the After-School All Stars program, which is funded by Arnold Schwartzeneger. Every year, he visits our school along with funding some trips to different sites around Michigan. Just a couple of weeks ago, we went to the Palace in Auburn Hills and saw a Pistons game. To discuss Parent Involvement, to say the least, there isn't any. Hardly any parents attend the conferences and/or the LSCO meetings, even with constant pressure to. The teachers have the ability to teach well, but many of them decide to waste time telling stories, or trying to impress the students. In conclusion, I belive Paul Robeson is a great school, but has flaws that brings itself down.
—Submitted by Khloe Daniels, a student


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 41% in 2013.

38 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
18%

2012

 
 
9%

2011

 
 
81%

2010

 
 
86%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

38 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
42%

2012

 
 
40%

2011

 
 
81%

2010

 
 
88%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 45% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
10%

2012

 
 
10%

2011

 
 
81%

2010

 
 
71%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
36%

2012

 
 
39%

2011

 
 
77%

2010

 
 
46%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 47% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
29%

2011

 
 
9%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 46% in 2013.

34 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
12%

2012

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
57%

2010

 
 
60%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 70% in 2013.

34 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
44%

2012

 
 
42%

2011

 
 
61%

2010

 
 
77%
Science

The state average for Science was 13% in 2013.

34 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
3%

2011

 
 
36%

2010

 
 
43%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 40% in 2013.

44 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
5%

2012

 
 
4%

2011

 
 
67%

2010

 
 
60%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

44 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
41%

2012

 
 
35%

2011

 
 
67%

2010

 
 
80%
Social Studies

The state average for Social Studies was 30% in 2013.

44 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
7%

2011

 
 
40%

2010

 
 
47%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 38% in 2013.

71 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
10%

2012

 
 
15%

2011

 
 
74%

2010

 
 
80%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 62% in 2013.

71 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
38%

2012

 
 
46%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
66%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 52% in 2013.

71 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
34%

2011

 
 
28%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 33% in 2013.

73 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
4%

2012

 
 
4%

2011

 
 
45%

2010

 
 
46%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

73 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
48%

2012

 
 
46%

2011

 
 
71%

2010

 
 
78%
Science

The state average for Science was 16% in 2013.

73 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
3%

2011

 
 
57%

2010

 
 
37%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
Black 100% 20%
American Indian/Alaska Native N/A 1%
Asian/Pacific Islander N/A 3%
Hispanic N/A 5%
White N/A 71%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 99%N/A42%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per FTE teacher 17N/A18
Source: NCES, 2008-2009
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

2701 Fenkell St
Detroit, MI 48238
Website: Click here
Phone: (313) 494-8100

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT