Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Foreign Language Immersion

Public | K-8 | 654 students

 

Be sure to visit

Take along one of
our checklists:

 
Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
Based on 1 rating
2012:
Based on 5 ratings
2011:
Based on 3 ratings
2010:
Based on 4 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

45 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted April 28, 2009

I attended FLICS the first year they added middle school as a seventh grader. They have a strong parent committee and excellent plans and goals for the school. As unorganized as they are I still received an excellent education and with very few middle school students we became more of a family. I am finishing up my freshman year at Cass Technical High school and Im proud to say My FLICS family, syudents and teachers, have prepared me for high school life.
—Submitted by a student


Posted February 11, 2009

FLICS is not what it was when I put my daughter in 5 years ago, she will not be returning next year. The principal lacks skills which in turn so does the rest of the administration. They took on too much when they moved and started going up to the 8th grade, so they had to fill up spaces in a hurry which in turn had an open enrollment to all students when I first enrolled my daughter they said this would not happen, but it has so she will not return. Too bad because there are some good teachers there they have been given the short end of the stick as well.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted January 29, 2009

Two kids in Kindergarten - Spanish. Sra. Milette is a great teacher. My kids are learning fast. .
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 25, 2008

I attended F.L.I.C.S from k-8. I was the first Chinese class to attend. I did very well there my teachers were always good. I am in high school now in the 10th grade I only wish it went up 2 k-12 because the school that I go to only teaches Spanish... I will always love this school no matter what hopeful it s still open in the near future so my kids as well as others may get a chance of a life time and attend F.L.I.C.S
—Submitted by a student


Posted September 2, 2008

I was very excited to send my son to this school last year for kindergarten and he has returned for the first grade this year. His teacher was fantastic and really spent spent a lot of time giving him extra work to keep him challenged. The problem I have with this school is the leadership and administrative staff. I already thought the school was unorganized but it was even more evident this morning with the complete chaos that was the first morning of the new school year. They have a huge challenges with communicationa and organization. I feel as though the prinipal and her staff do not have the ability to communicate effectively and they seem to have no desire to do so. If there is not drastic improvement in this area I will not send him back next year.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 21, 2008

this school is wonderful I love it . My children are very fulient in spanish now
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 12, 2008

FLICS is not a good school, the school needs a stronger principal and a better vice principal. This is not the school for my children and yours.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted April 17, 2008

My child transferred to FLICS in the 7th grade. I thought it was a great concept and my child had great hopes in learning Japanese. My son did very well in Japanese and loves the language. The Japanese teacher is good, very attentive. The draw back is only one high school offers Japanese and that is Cass. If your child is going to Renaissance or King, you can forget it!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 27, 2007

Flics is not a good school for the students
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 5, 2007

The school has no organization. Teachers are often late or absent. Communication between the school/teachers and parents is nonexistent. Office staff often seem overwhelmed and uncertain about how to answer parents' questions about general issues.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 27, 2007

I am unhappy with FLICS. You have to be a classroom parent or else involved with school to get a special treatment for you and your child. It is sad but it is true. There is lack of communication between parents and teachers. They will call you only if there is something wrong. We are taking our girl elswere.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 20, 2007

FLICS is a superior school in many ways- quality of teacher instruction, the langugae curriculum, and parental involvement. The challeneges that FLICS has in the 2006-2007 school yeas come from a) a move to a newer building and b) the expansion of the school to include a 6-8 grade program. Many of the challeneges come from students who have transferred in from other schools. Schools dont expand if they arent performing at high levels. A child beginning in this program in the primary grades will be proficient enough to place out of high school level language classes. My place of birth is questioned by native spanish-speakers after they have spoken with my 5th grade daughter in Spanish. A truly global education awaits at FLICS; the long term benefits are undisputable.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 8, 2007

The immersion concept is wonderful. The parent involvement is necessary. The staff and administration are horrible. My wife and I both participate at school functions, work with our child in her language of choice, work with her when there is home work. I find that the teachers and administration have there favor student(s) that they choose to nurture and protect. All children should be given the same opportunities.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted December 20, 2006

My daughters won't be returning to FLICS after the holidays. This school does not have the professionalism that I expect. I felt that my views and involvemnent as a parent were not welcomed. So long DPS, it's off to private school we go ...
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 27, 2006

Boy I am totally over this school. Foreign language immersion is an excellent concept and the school has great potential, but I will agree with other parents, this school lacks the appropriate administrative practices, staff, and services to really come out on top. I even think the school works best for the younger children in K-2 with its full immersion, but becomes totally chaotic at the higher grades. It is even easier to follow up at home with other materials when children are small, such as basic arithmetic and reading. Once the children are older...forget about it. FLICS becomes another flaw in the DPS system. If FLICS had the right funding and management, I think it would work, but right now my experience has been less than favorable!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 21, 2006

My children have flourished at FLICS. They are strong in their subjects, and have progressed in both the Japanese and French languages. The premise of the school definitely works when parents are involved. If you do not have the time to focus on your children, and enhance their development in coursework as well as the foreign languages, then this school is not for you. I really love the multicultural philosophy. I was a bit concerned about the move to a new building, but now that the children are there, things are looking better. It has nice science labs,air conditioning, and adequate space for the children. I believe FLICS is a great school of choice!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 1, 2006

My family did not have the best experience with FLICS. The school seems really over-rated. Organization lacks terribly. The bi-lingual philosophy is great, but the school needs more staff, funding, and leadership to function successfully.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 8, 2006

I withdrew my child from FLICS this past school year because of poor administrative practices. The prinicpal was slow to address legitimate complaints from parents.The school did not have much structure.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 12, 2006

Flics have now moved to their new location. I find that the school is not all what it claims to be. The school does not have enough teachers for each grade level. The curriculm of learning moves to fast for kindergarteners to grasp this new language and style of teaching. Sometimes the communcation between the teachers can be difficult because it is hard to understand them.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted January 23, 2006

This is my first year at F.l.i.c.s., and my child is being taught all the required english for the semester at one time. Then the class moves on to all the math required for the semester, etc. My child & I find this a bit overwhelming, she feels the work is being thrown at her in school. So when she arrives home I find myself working with her on a daily basis, reviewing concepts and teaching her myself. I am not sure this is what I'd like to keep doing til the 5th grade. I wasn't prepared for the reality of the immersion concept. Most of the teachers have accents that take time to get accustomed to, which slows down the learning process for new students just entering the school. The tutoring available for her language costs $25.00 per week, the other languages are free. I hope my child survives this transition.
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 41% in 2013.

90 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
28%

2012

 
 
13%

2011

 
 
95%

2010

 
 
96%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

90 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
62%

2012

 
 
51%

2011

 
 
88%

2010

 
 
97%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 45% in 2013.

81 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
28%

2012

 
 
22%

2011

 
 
93%

2010

 
 
94%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

82 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
62%

2012

 
 
65%

2011

 
 
88%

2010

 
 
90%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 47% in 2013.

81 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
37%

2011

 
 
51%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 46% in 2013.

65 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
20%

2012

 
 
27%

2011

 
 
75%

2010

 
 
64%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 70% in 2013.

65 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
68%

2012

 
 
76%

2011

 
 
90%

2010

 
 
78%
Science

The state average for Science was 13% in 2013.

65 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
2%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
72%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 40% in 2013.

39 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
39%

2012

 
 
26%

2011

 
 
74%

2010

 
 
86%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

39 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
72%

2012

 
 
70%

2011

 
 
82%

2010

 
 
92%
Social Studies

The state average for Social Studies was 30% in 2013.

39 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
15%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
80%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 38% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
43%

2012

 
 
13%

2011

 
 
96%

2010

 
 
73%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 62% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
67%

2012

 
 
47%

2011

 
 
96%

2010

 
 
82%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 52% in 2013.

42 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
62%

2011

 
 
56%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 33% in 2013.

36 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
19%

2012

 
 
43%

2011

 
 
79%

2010

 
 
66%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

36 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
72%

2012

 
 
83%

2011

 
 
88%

2010

 
 
91%
Science

The state average for Science was 16% in 2013.

36 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
84%

2010

 
 
77%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
Black 99% 19%
American Indian/Alaska Native 0% 1%
Asian 0% 3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander 0% 0%
Hispanic 0% 6%
Two or more races 0% 2%
White 0% 70%
Source: NCES, 2010-2011

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 62%N/A46%
Source: NCES, 2010-2011

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per FTE teacher 20N/A18
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

School basics

School Leader's name
  • Mr. Todd Losie
Fax number
  • (313) 651-2401

Resources

Extra learning resources offered
  • Title I Targeted Assistance program (TAS)
School leaders can update this information here.

Upcoming Events

No upcoming events found for this school
Searching for school events...
Date
Title
  • {{date}}
    {{title}}
Export calendar
Microsoft Outlook
iCal Format
Google Calendar
POWERED BY
Tandem

Apply

 

TIP: Don't forget to ask about documents required for enrollment, such as your child's birth certificate, proof of address, or a record of immunizations.

 
Apply now
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

6501 West Outer Dr
Detroit, MI 48235
Website: Click here
Phone: (313) 651-2400

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT