Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

George Washington Carver Academy

Charter | K-8 | 455 students

Living in Highland Park

Situated in an urban neighborhood. The median home value is $69,800. The average monthly rent for a 2 bedroom apartment is $690.

Source: Sperling's Best Places
 
Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
No new ratings
2012:
No new ratings
2011:
Based on 2 ratings
2010:
Based on 3 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

24 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted December 21, 2011

I love my school and anybhody who disagree can just get off this site. they dnt belong on this site


Posted March 1, 2011

My children has been at GWCA since kindergarten and they love their school. They know who their prinicpal is by name. They can go into her office and ask her anything. Most kids can't tell who their prinicpal is. She expects a lot out of the students and staff. She truly wnat these children to succeed. She believes in teaching to master not to memorize and important. It is a global economy that are kids are going to have to compete in.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 2, 2010

I am a teacher at this school who has been asked to return in the fall. If I could find another job, I'd walk out the door and never look back. Most of the "issues" at this school are caused by the incompetence of the management company and the administrators. This school is run on personalities and numbers, it has no heart and no brain. If you're one of the "in" crowd"and your salary is not too high, then you'll have a job and get good reviews. But, if you speak your mind as a professional educator and point out problems or suggest other ways of doing things, and/or you're getting paid a proper salary, then you're history around here. I kept my poorly paid mouth shut, but as a teacher I'm just "phoning it in"-this place is a terrible school.
—Submitted by a teacher


Posted June 30, 2010

Kids are great....It's a tough world...Yes our kids are tough...parents are tough, but somehow the kids come together and get things done. All those bake sales were for the kids. This school year marked by far the most field trips ever taken by this school. Ask the kids who their principal is and if she cares about them and they will tell you Ms. S. Ask them about any other CAO/principal and they won't be able to tell you.
—Submitted by a teacher


Posted June 29, 2010

Two other schools with the same mismanagement style of the CAO/principle have been closed for this reason. It's obvious to staff the great potential to bring the school to its final demise. Unfortunately whoever runs the school does not know how to run a school effectively! More teachers were laid off in a cruel manner on the last day of school/ budget cuts(soon you'll see more new teachers to replace them) . But, it is never understood how these selections are made (not seniority,not poor performance. Teachers are dismissed people that the CAO does not like, have opinions and are seeking further advancement for their careers. A "real" leader would embrace these employees, but not exhibits diabetic up)/diabetic down) attitude. Favorites are selected and pitted against each other depending on their skills, just to keep morale low, i.e., against experienced teachers. CAO/Principal is also severly distorted.
—Submitted by a teacher


Posted October 4, 2009

I am a substitute teacher @ GWC and I enjoy my assignments there. There are problems just as any other has, but the difference here is that the teachers and administration genuinely care about the students. I believe more parent involvement would make the difference. Parents volunteer in your child's classroom and observe what the teachers and administration have to deal with on a daily basis with YOUR CHILD! I think you will leave with a different perspective.
—Submitted by a teacher


Posted August 10, 2009

I love the teachers at GWAC, however they are not appreciated or given much incentive. These are people who are teaching our children and need the support of administration and board members. I volunteer frequently, and have one child enrolled at GWAC. I don't think he will be back in Sept of 09, which is sad because I really care about the students and the teachers. I served on the school improvement board with disappointing results. Mr. Gordon is a very sincere, hard working principle who greeted the parents and thanked them for bringing their kids to school, I sure hope he stays. He is very compassionate and caring. The management and board members need to listen to the teachers and the parents.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 13, 2009

GWCA is the worst school ever. When I first put my child in this school was when they had trailers outside of the school and they were building to look as it does now. But they have had may of people come and go teacher and a principals and the whole I care for students have gone down. There may be some who care but some whom don't. I'm Glad that my child is leaving the school this year and she been there since K-8. This school needs lots of work with Teachers and students learning. I will never tell anyone how good this school is. Due to it's not.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 9, 2008

Not a good school. They have the lowest score in Michigan. The teacher sat around and talk all day. They can not keep a pripincal. Parking is crazy. These charter schools need to do better. Now my daughter is attending a new school this year and so far we love it. They have more things for the students and parents to do.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 8, 2008

I think it is a great school! They have a lot of new programs for the students there!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 17, 2008

A small group of parents, 4 or 5 meet every few weeks to discuss the quality of this school. Together we have about 10 kids in the school, from 2nd through 7th grade. We make it a point to attend board meetings, visit with administrators and talk with the teachers. The school has many problems; the board and teachers blame the administration, the administrators blame the teachers, etc. There's a new management company and a few new board memebers, they need to do a clean sweep of the anministration and cut loose a few of the teachers. As a parent group we're giving this school one last chance, if there's no improvement we're taking our kids out before count day. Some things are great, but it's taking too long to correct the problems.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 9, 2008

I have three kids at this school and agree that the 2007-08 was pretty bad. The administration promised new books, new technology and new programs-nothing was delivered! The Principal was always in her office, the kids didn't even know her. The Assistant Principal was so inconsistent he was ineffective. There's a new management company taking over now, hopefully they will bring in some professional administrators. Our kids deserve better.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 27, 2008

I have two students at this school; 7th and 2nd graders. The quality of the school really slipped this year. They've had three different principals in the last two years. The current administratiors show no vision or leadership, they seem to be overwhelmed and just going through the motions. Usually out of sight in the office, not out and about the school. This apathy is apparent in the teachers and trickles down to the students. Minimal afterschool programs that only a few attend. Afterschool tutoring is more like playtime. Middle school kids are out of control. Of course the school did not make AYP.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 19, 2008

I have 3 children that attend George Washington Carver Academy. I enrolled my children there because I heard that it was a good school. So far, my children have had academic success far beyond what they achieved at their other school. As I read the other comments, I would have to totally disagree with most of the statements. The change in administration has proven to be a wise choice! The previous Principal was Lawyer, and this administration is made up of seasoned educators. We cannot be swayed by people who have personal agendas against 'GOOD' people. The Administrators have always helped me with any issues that I have had. Mr. W is as stern as a rattlesnake, but the kids know that he genuinely cares about them and their academics! It is OUR responsibility as parents to raise our kids, NOT the schools that they attend.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 5, 2008

2007-08 school year was a disaster. New Principal seems to be trying to recreate the DPS school she came from-No leadership at all. Alot of promises but no follow through. New Assistant Principal seems dazed and confused; one day harsh and strict, the next day he's the kids best buddy. This school needs new administrators, professionals with a vision. Right now, the rough kids are running the school, the teachers are caught in the middle and the best students are loosing out.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 16, 2007

So far my son is doing very well in this school. Compared to the last elementary school he went to which was a public school, he has improved his grades and they seem to be more patient. I look forward to seeing how the rest of this school year will turn out.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 28, 2007

Carver Academy has more successes than failures. During the 2006-2007 academic year, 33% of the 8th graders were accepted into either Cass, Renaissance, and King. That has to say alot for the quality of education that exists at the academy. The % of Highly Qualified teachers has risen drastically over the last two (2) years at Carver. Carvers Robotics and Rocketry Teams have competed in Washington D.C. The only ALL African American Rocketry program in the city! No school is perfect, most people 'downplay' schools by word of mouth without ever stepping foot on the schools grounds! Carver is ACHIEVING!!


Posted November 9, 2006

Hi, I graduated from Carver in June of 2005, and during the time I attended Carver, to the time I left, the school administrative seemed as if they couldn't accommodate the students. Every year after sixth grade, the school became more deteriorated than the year before. The teachers became unsuccessful at controlling the students, and the learning environment declined.
—Submitted by a former student


Posted March 7, 2005

This school is really on a downward spiral. The principal is more concerned about keeping the students in the building for the money they get from funding, rather than disciplining students with behavior problems. My child was bullied on a daily basis and the principal did not discipline the child for fear that the parent would remove her child from the school.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted December 8, 2004

This school does not provide accommodating lessons for all students. My son was required to have special services and the school did not provide him with the services and were not required b/c tis learning institution. The school is 'charter' meaning they are public but privately owned. They have less guidlines than public. I took this issue to Lansing and I had to remove my son b/c they lack the resources, but wanted his head count funds. The school does not have good classroom management skills in any aspect and instead of dealing with the stduents with behavior problems they will let them go back to public who has to accept the students w/o the application process. This school policies and procedures are totally unaccepteble for parents and students within this community or any community.
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 41% in 2013.

51 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
28%

2012

 
 
2%

2011

 
 
85%

2010

 
 
89%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

51 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
45%

2012

 
 
33%

2011

 
 
62%

2010

 
 
62%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 45% in 2013.

36 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
11%

2012

 
 
6%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
75%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

37 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
30%

2012

 
 
21%

2011

 
 
54%

2010

 
 
50%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 47% in 2013.

37 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
35%

2011

 
 
27%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 46% in 2013.

52 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
4%

2012

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
41%

2010

 
 
33%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 70% in 2013.

52 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
44%

2012

 
 
50%

2011

 
 
59%

2010

 
 
47%
Science

The state average for Science was 13% in 2013.

53 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
43%

2010

 
 
36%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 40% in 2013.

30 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
7%

2012

 
 
11%

2011

 
 
49%

2010

 
 
46%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

31 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
45%

2012

 
 
32%

2011

 
 
47%

2010

 
 
66%
Social Studies

The state average for Social Studies was 30% in 2013.

31 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
7%

2011

 
 
36%

2010

 
 
32%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 38% in 2013.

48 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
6%

2012

 
 
6%

2011

 
 
49%

2010

 
 
74%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 62% in 2013.

48 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
38%

2012

 
 
24%

2011

 
 
47%

2010

 
 
51%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 52% in 2013.

48 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
38%

2011

 
 
25%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 33% in 2013.

45 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
4%

2012

 
 
2%

2011

 
 
43%

2010

 
 
44%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

45 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
36%

2012

 
 
31%

2011

 
 
70%

2010

 
 
69%
Science

The state average for Science was 16% in 2013.

47 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
2%

2011

 
 
46%

2010

 
 
33%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
Black 100% 20%
American Indian/Alaska Native N/A 1%
Asian/Pacific Islander N/A 3%
Hispanic N/A 5%
White N/A 71%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 94%N/A42%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per FTE teacher 16N/A18
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Awards

Academic awards received in the past 3 years
  • Crysler Foundation award (2008)

Special education / special needs

Specific academic themes or areas of focus
  • Special education
Specialized programs for specific types of special education students
  • Specific learning disabilities
  • Speech and language impairments

Arts & music

Music
  • Band
  • Choir / Chorus
Performing and written arts
  • Drama

Language learning

Foreign languages taught
  • Spanish
School leaders can update this information here.

School basics

School start time
  • 8:00am
School end time
  • 3:30pm
Before school or after school care / program onsite
  • After school
  • Before school
School Leader's name
  • Mrs. Celestine Sanders
Special schedule
  • Block scheduling
Fax number
  • (313) 865-7865

Programs

Specific academic themes or areas of focus

Don't understand these terms?
  • Special education
Specialized programs for specific types of special education students
  • Specific learning disabilities
  • Speech and language impairments
Foreign languages taught
  • Spanish
School leaders can update this information here.

Sports

Boys sports
  • Basketball
  • Track
Girls sports
  • Basketball
  • Cheerleading
  • Track

Arts & music

Music
  • Band
  • Choir / Chorus
Performing arts
  • Drama
School leaders can update this information here.

School culture

Dress Code
  • Uniforms
School leaders can update this information here.

Apply

To learn more about enrolling, please call the school.
 

TIP: Don't forget to ask about documents required for enrollment, such as your child's birth certificate, proof of address, or a record of immunizations.

 
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

14510 2nd Ave
Highland Park, MI 48203
Phone: (313) 865-6024

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT