Advertisement

No rating

GreatSchools Rating

Capital Area Academy

Charter | K-8 | 207 students

 

Be sure to visit

Take along one of
our checklists:

 

Living in Lansing

Situated in a suburban neighborhood. The median home value is $62,000. The average monthly rent for a 2 bedroom apartment is $680.

Source: Sperling's Best Places
 
Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
No new ratings
2012:
No new ratings
2011:
No new ratings
2010:
Based on 2 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

7 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted April 30, 2010

Capital Area Academy, still in 2010, has a high turn over in staff. They have huge bullying issues that are completely out of control. Bullying should not be tolerated in any school, but here it is out of control. The curriculum is what is required by the State but it moves so quickly that students move around, on a weekly basis, from one subject to another before they've even comprehenended what the were taught the previous week. Stuffing kids brains full of information without giving the learning time needed to comprehend it, is a complete waste of educational instruction. They don't give enough breaks to their students. They get one break and that is about 30 minutes. 15 minutes for lunch and 15 minutes for recess. Students need breaks. 20 minutes in the morning, lunch recess, and then 20 minutes in the afternoon could make for better pupils.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted April 27, 2010

2008 I had an intervention student at CAA. CAA has extremely serious issues with bullying and despite parent involvement in presenting possible solutions, the issues were not properly addressed. Teachers are not attentive to the needs of the students, allowing the students to take charge of the classroom. Students are totally out of control and staff allow it to continue. Some teachers demonstrate inefficient qualification to teach in the area of their assignment. Some classrooms were rooms to throw spit balls, horseplay, and bully others. No academic leadership.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 27, 2009

I have sent two children to this school for 3 years while on military duty in Lansing. There has been a constant turnover of teachers at this school for many years. They try hard but are overwhelmed by a large number of unprepared students and parents who take no interest in their children's education. There are no extra curricular activities or for students who need remediation in their weak areas. The school is not as clean as it should be and bullying is a big problem. Falling test scores indicate that this school should be shut down as they seem to be hurting the students academically rather than helping them.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 24, 2008

this school was not helpful at all because now that im in a new school most of the kids learned about some of the math that we are learning about in 7th they learned last year in sixth grade this school has bullying problems
—Submitted by a student


Posted June 9, 2008

My child has excelled at CAA. The school has a family atmosphere, student achievement, and the students are known by everyone.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 11, 2005

The teachers at Capital are excellent! They are great at helping the children at whatever level they are at. The class sizes are small compared to other schools in the area. I feel a great sense of family in the entire school. I have been very happy with the school.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 6, 2004

This school has not met the needs of my children in their years there. My oldest child has attended since CAA's beginning, and the school's ability to educate them has steadily declined. This may be related to budget issues, and I believe they are under-staffed, as there are currently about 25 children to each teacher. It may also be contributed to lack of organization, as high staff turnover and changing roles is an issue too. Capital Area Academy has failed to meet my children's academic needs and it has been a very disappointing experience.
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 41% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
92%

2010

 
 
92%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
75%

2010

 
 
75%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 45% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
83%

2010

 
 
75%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
69%

2010

 
 
70%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 47% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
31%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 46% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
78%

2010

 
 
50%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 70% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
61%

2010

 
 
43%
Science

The state average for Science was 13% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
78%

2010

 
 
35%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 40% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
39%

2010

 
 
36%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
52%

2010

 
 
54%
Social Studies

The state average for Social Studies was 30% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
26%

2010

 
 
30%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 38% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
37%

2010

 
 
76%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 62% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
30%

2010

 
 
62%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 52% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
7%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 33% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
37%

2010

 
 
40%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
63%

2010

 
 
65%
Science

The state average for Science was 16% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
37%

2010

 
 
50%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
Black 40% 19%
White 33% 70%
Hispanic 19% 6%
Two or more races 6% 2%
American Indian/Alaska Native 1% 1%
Asian 1% 3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander 0% 0%
Source: NCES, 2010-2011

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 90%N/A46%
Source: NCES, 2010-2011

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per FTE teacher 14N/A18
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Special education / special needs

Specific academic themes or areas of focus
  • Special education
School leaders can update this information here.

School basics

School Leader's name
  • Mr. Dan Laabs
Fax number
  • (517) 882-0400

Programs

Specific academic themes or areas of focus

Don't understand these terms?
  • Special education

Resources

Extra learning resources offered
  • Title I Schoolwide program (SWP)
School leaders can update this information here.

Upcoming Events

No upcoming events found for this school
Searching for school events...
Date
Title
  • {{date}}
    {{title}}
Export calendar
Microsoft Outlook
iCal Format
Google Calendar
POWERED BY
Tandem

Apply

 

TIP: Don't forget to ask about documents required for enrollment, such as your child's birth certificate, proof of address, or a record of immunizations.

 
Apply now
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

5525 South Pennsylvania Ave
Lansing, MI 48911
Website: Click here
Phone: (517) 882-1400

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare

Nearby schools

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT