Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Wainwright School

Public | K-7 | 291 students

Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
No new ratings
2012:
No new ratings
2011:
Based on 1 rating
2010:
Based on 3 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

7 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted June 7, 2011

This school has went way down hill lately. Look at the MEAP scores. The kids get there and do half way decent at MEAP tests. By the time they hit 5th grade they are doing horrible. Reo elementary is nearby. Reo 5th grade averages 75% on the MEAP. Wainwright is at 48%.. If you care about your kids send them anyplace else. This place is one of the worst in Lansing if not THE worst.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 24, 2010

It is an great educational facility, but it would be... extraordinary if the kids were better maintained than the way they are. the staff around the school are always kind, and are always willing to help if a child is in need, the school it's self shouldn't have been given a low rating, because its not the teachers, or staff, its the way the kids act that hinder the opportunity for academic success of this fine education institution . As a former student at this school I've seen first hand what a little nurturing can do for the "out of control" children, but then again, you can't always blame the child, so some of this blame should, and must be placed on the parents of said child. There are many fine teachers at this school. -Cameron j. Fair
—Submitted by a student


Posted July 28, 2010

I love this school. The teachers are very nice as well as helpful. This school, has takin my very bright 7yr old and challenged her on every level. I recently moved here from down south and this educational structure is far better then where we came from. My child was bored to tears until we moved here and she was actually intellectually challenged to think on her own. This school with their new theme of Law and Leadership has taught my daughter how to be a good leader as well as understand the consequences of her action.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 6, 2010

Very disappointed with this school....beware you should not send any good kids to this school with good qualitys. The children are out of control at this school
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 19, 2009

This school has made a lot of changes in the past two years. the theme of leadership has really improved the school. I see the students taking responsibility of what they do more often. My child loves all the people they get to meet and things they get to do. Adding the courtroom has made my son decide that he wants to be a judge.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted May 8, 2006

I'm very disappointed at the overal quality of this school, principal, teachers and other staff. God forbid your child is a Special Needs child. This school does not know the first thing about these children, nor do they care. If a problem arises, you can be assured you will not be able to talk to the principal about it because she over talks you and you can't get a word in otherwise. Be very cautious of this school.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted January 27, 2006

Changing this school to a acadamy was a joke. The level of teaching, disapline and overall atmasphere has plunged to record lows. After only six monthes my child as went from a happy A and B student to a sullen unhappy C and D one. Needless to say he will not be coming back. The students are unruley and the teachers do not concern themselfs with theur students trouble areas. Very dissapointing to say the least!
—Submitted by s h, a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 41% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
7%

2011

 
 
89%

2010

 
 
82%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 66% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
27%

2011

 
 
82%

2010

 
 
85%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 45% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
15%

2011

 
 
77%

2010

 
 
69%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
50%

2011

 
 
69%

2010

 
 
53%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 47% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
11%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 46% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
51%

2010

 
 
51%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 70% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
40%

2011

 
 
59%

2010

 
 
62%
Science

The state average for Science was 13% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
36%

2010

 
 
42%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 40% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
0%

2011

 
 
54%

2010

 
 
63%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 68% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
29%

2011

 
 
74%

2010

 
 
71%
Social Studies

The state average for Social Studies was 30% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
39%

2010

 
 
36%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Math

The state average for Math was 38% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
13%

2011

 
 
50%

2010

 
 
30%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 62% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2012

 
 
36%

2011

 
 
36%

2010

 
 
40%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 52% in 2013.

2013

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
13%
Scale: % proficient or advanced

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Michigan used the Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) to test students in grades 3 through 8 in math, reading and writing; in grades 5 and 8 in science; and in grades 6 and 9 in social studies. The MEAP is a standards-based test, which measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Michigan. The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level.

Beginning in the 2011-2012 school year, the Michigan State Board of Education implemented new definitions of what it means to be proficient on the MEAP test. The new standards for proficiency are higher than in previous years and the percent of students earning a proficient score is expected to be lower as a result of this change.

See Michigan's state standards

Source: Michigan Department of Education

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
Black 78% 20%
White 12% 71%
Hispanic 7% 5%
Asian/Pacific Islander 2% 3%
American Indian/Alaska Native 0% 1%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 77%N/A42%
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per FTE teacher 13N/A18
Source: NCES, 2008-2009

School basics

School Leader's name
  • Ms. LaDonna Mask
Fax number
  • (517) 755-1669

Programs

Specific academic themes or areas of focus

Don't understand these terms?
  • Special education
School leaders can update this information here.
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

4200 Wainwright Ave
Lansing, MI 48911
Website: Click here
Phone: (517) 755-1660

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT