Image of pencil and books on table

 
  API Results
 
API Growth (2008-2009)

781 (2009 Growth)
778 (2008 Base)

  • The Academic Performance Index (API) system is based on year-over-year test score performance through a two-year cycle. The Base score is for the first year and the Growth score is for the second year.
  • Comparing the API Growth to the Base shows whether or not this school's test score performance improved between spring 2008 and spring 2009 (as reported in September 2009).
  • The API ranges between 200 and 1000, with 800 as the statewide goal for all schools.
 
API Growth Target (2008-2009)

-50-25 0255075100
  3 (2009 Growth result)
  5 (2009 Growth target)
 

  This School Middle Schools That Met Targets Statewide
Met its 2009 schoolwide growth target No 74%
Met all subgroup growth targets No 46%
  • Each school is assigned an API Growth target by the state, determined by calculating 5% of the difference between the Base API and 800, or a minimum of 5 point growth. Schools with APIs at or above 800 must maintain a minimum API of 800.
  • To encourage schools to improve achievement for all students, the state computes APIs and sets improvement targets for the different student subgroups at the school.
  • The state reports APIs for schools that test a minimum of 85% of eligible students in any subject.

 
2009 API Growth By Subgroup

781
700
883
703
667
567
  All
Students
Hispanic White Socio-
econ. Dis-
advant.
English Language Learners Students with Disabilities
  • The results shown here reflect the school's Growth API for the 2008-2009 school year for all students and for each of the major subgroups of students as reported by the state.
  • The 2009 API Growth is calculated using test score results from spring 2009.

2008 API Statewide Rank


  • The API Statewide Rank ranges from 1 to 10. A rank of 10, for example, means that the school's API fell into the top 10% of all schools in the state with a comparable grade range.
  • The 2008 Statewide Rank is based on the results of tests that students took in spring 2008.

2008 API Similar Schools Rank

  • To create the Similar Schools Rank, the California Department of Education compares this school's test scores to 100 schools across the state with similar demographic profiles.
  • California uses parent education level, poverty level, student mobility, student ethnicity and other data to identify similar schools.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with API results from nearby schools

2008-2009 API subgroup results  

Back to top >
  CST Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 6

English Language Arts
 52% (2009)
 40% (2008)
 42% (2007)
 43% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 52% in 2009.

Math
 40% (2009)
 36% (2008)
 38% (2007)
 42% (2006)
The state average for Math was 49% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7

English Language Arts
 55% (2009)
 49% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 45% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 54% in 2009.

Math
 42% (2009)
 32% (2008)
 36% (2007)
 39% (2006)
The state average for Math was 43% in 2009.

Algebra I
 100% (2009)
 100% (2008)
 94% (2007)
The state average for Algebra I was 81% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8

General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)
 50% (2009)
 39% (2008)
 32% (2007)
 37% (2006)
The state average for General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards) was 30% in 2009.

Science
 62% (2009)
 63% (2008)
 48% (2007)
 48% (2006)
The state average for Science was 56% in 2009.

English Language Arts
 51% (2009)
 51% (2008)
 47% (2007)
 46% (2006)
The state average for English Language Arts was 48% in 2009.

History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative
 48% (2009)
 50% (2008)
 42% (2007)
The state average for History - Social Science Grade 8 Cumulative was 42% in 2009.

Algebra I
 94% (2009)
 95% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 89% (2006)
The state average for Algebra I was 44% in 2009.

Geometry
 100% (2009)
 100% (2008)
 98% (2007)
 97% (2006)
The state average for Geometry was 87% in 2009.

Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the tests

  • In 2008-2009 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview

Compare with test results from nearby schools

The California Reading List: Helpful information to support your child's reading

 

Back to top >
  CST Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 6
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students52%
Females55%
Males49%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino33%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)76%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Non-economically disadvantaged75%
Students with disability50%
Students with no reported disability52%
English learner9%
Fluent-English proficient and English only74%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state52%

MathThis School
All Students40%
Females39%
Males42%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino24%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)62%
Economically disadvantaged24%
Non-economically disadvantaged63%
Students with disability28%
Students with no reported disability41%
English learner9%
Fluent-English proficient and English only58%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state41%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 7
English Language ArtsThis School
All Students55%
Females58%
Males52%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino34%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)87%
Economically disadvantaged37%
Non-economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disability29%
Students with no reported disability56%
English learner11%
Fluent-English proficient and English only78%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state55%

MathThis School
All Students42%
Females39%
Males45%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino28%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)70%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Non-economically disadvantaged61%
Students with disability14%
Students with no reported disability44%
English learner13%
Fluent-English proficient and English only59%
Parent education - declined to state42%

Algebra IThis School
All Students100%
Females100%
Males100%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)100%
Non-economically disadvantaged100%
Students with no reported disability100%
Fluent-English proficient and English only100%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state100%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

Grade 8
General Mathematics (Grades 6 & 7 Standards)This School
All Students50%
Females51%
Males49%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino44%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)62%
Economically disadvantaged44%
Non-economically disadvantaged60%
Students with disability8%
Students with no reported disability56%
English learner20%
Fluent-English proficient and English only66%
Parent education - declined to state50%

ScienceThis School
All Students62%
Females61%
Males64%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino46%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)82%
Economically disadvantaged47%
Non-economically disadvantaged81%
Students with disability21%
Students with no reported disability66%
English learner17%
Fluent-English proficient and English only79%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state63%

English Language ArtsThis School
All Students51%
Females55%
Males46%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino33%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)73%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Non-economically disadvantaged71%
Students with disability9%
Students with no reported disability54%
English learner6%
Fluent-English proficient and English only67%
Gifted and talented98%
Parent education - declined to state51%

History - Social Science Grade 8 CumulativeThis School
All Students48%
Females50%
Males46%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino28%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)72%
Economically disadvantaged28%
Non-economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disability12%
Students with no reported disability52%
English learner3%
Fluent-English proficient and English only66%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state48%

Algebra IThis School
All Students94%
Females95%
Males92%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latino85%
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)96%
Economically disadvantaged81%
Non-economically disadvantaged98%
Students with no reported disability93%
Fluent-English proficient and English only96%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state93%

GeometryThis School
All Students100%
Females100%
Males100%
African Americann/a
Asiann/a
Filipinon/a
Hispanic or Latinon/a
American Indian or Alaska Nativen/a
Native Hawaiiann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
Guamaniann/a
Samoann/a
Tahitiann/a
Other Pacific Islandern/a
White (not Hispanic)100%
Non-economically disadvantaged100%
Students with no reported disability100%
Fluent-English proficient and English only100%
Gifted and talented100%
Parent education - declined to state100%
Source: CA Dept. of Education, 2008-2009

About the tests

  • In 2008-2009 California used the California Standards Tests (CSTs) to test students in English language arts in grades 2 through 11; math in grades 2 through 7; science in grades 5, 8 and 10; and history-social science in grades 8 and 11. Middle and high school students also took subject-specific CSTs in math and science, depending on the course in which they were enrolled.
  • The CSTs are standards-based tests, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of California.
  • The different student groups are identified by the California Department of Education; if there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above proficient on the tests.

Testing in California: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Marco Forster Middle School?

Rocket Fuel