Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 63% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 50% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 85% (2008)
 82% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 82% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 71% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 54% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 80% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 66% (2008)
 75% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 65% (2008)
Data not available for this school (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 77% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 88% (2008)
Data not available for this school (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 79% (2008)
Data not available for this school (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 70% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 85% (2008)
 100% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 85% (2008)
 97% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students63%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White63%
Not economically disadvantaged68%
Students without disabilities73%
Not English language learners62%

WritingThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners85%

MathThis School
All Students82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White83%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners81%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students54%
Male44%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White60%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners56%

WritingThis School
All Students80%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners79%

MathThis School
All Students66%
Male65%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White70%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities82%
Not English language learners68%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students65%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White65%
Not economically disadvantaged71%
Students without disabilities75%
Not English language learners65%

ScienceThis School
All Students77%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners77%

WritingThis School
All Students88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners88%

MathThis School
All Students79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners79%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not English language learners70%

WritingThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not English language learners85%

MathThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
Whiten/a
Not English language learners85%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Dominick H. Ferrara School?

Rocket Fuel