Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 5

Reading
 72% (2008)
 80% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 80% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 88% (2008)
 92% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 86% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 83% (2008)
 74% (2007)
 78% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 92% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 93% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7

Reading
 79% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2008.

Writing
 84% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 80% in 2008.

Math
 86% (2008)
 77% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8

Reading
 79% (2008)
 80% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 77% in 2008.

Science
 74% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2008.

Writing
 82% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 77% (2008)
 84% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students72%
Female69%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged77%
Students with disabilities36%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners72%

ScienceThis School
All Students80%
Female77%
Male82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White81%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students with disabilities39%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners80%

WritingThis School
All Students88%
Female93%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged83%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students with disabilities73%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners88%

MathThis School
All Students86%
Female85%
Male87%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Economically disadvantaged82%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students with disabilities52%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners86%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students83%
Female86%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged73%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities31%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners83%

WritingThis School
All Students92%
Female98%
Male87%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Economically disadvantaged83%
Not economically disadvantaged97%
Students with disabilities65%
Students without disabilities96%
Not English language learners93%

MathThis School
All Students93%
Female94%
Male93%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White93%
Economically disadvantaged91%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students with disabilities69%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners93%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7
ReadingThis School
All Students79%
Female78%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged72%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities39%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners80%

WritingThis School
All Students84%
Female88%
Male82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Economically disadvantaged79%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students with disabilities52%
Students without disabilities88%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis School
All Students86%
Female87%
Male86%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White87%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students with disabilities39%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners86%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8
ReadingThis School
All Students79%
Female80%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White79%
Economically disadvantaged71%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students with disabilities52%
Students without disabilities83%
Not English language learners80%

ScienceThis School
All Students74%
Female75%
Male72%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged68%
Not economically disadvantaged78%
Students with disabilities36%
Students without disabilities79%
Not English language learners74%

WritingThis School
All Students82%
Female92%
Male74%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students with disabilities44%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis School
All Students77%
Female82%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Economically disadvantaged70%
Not economically disadvantaged82%
Students with disabilities32%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners79%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Killingly Intermediate School?

Rocket Fuel