Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 85% (2008)
 52% (2007)
 67% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 79% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 76% (2008)
 61% (2007)
 66% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 73% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 76% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 84% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 73% (2008)
 55% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 85% (2008)
 79% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 94% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 82% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 67% (2008)
 79% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 85% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 82% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 82% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7

Reading
 94% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 80% in 2008.

Writing
 91% (2008)
 91% (2007)
 90% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 80% in 2008.

Math
 97% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8

Reading
 82% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 77% in 2008.

Science
 85% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2008.

Writing
 63% (2008)
 97% (2007)
 85% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 82% (2008)
 90% (2007)
 94% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities87%
Not English language learners85%

WritingThis School
All Students79%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners79%

MathThis School
All Students76%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Not economically disadvantaged79%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners76%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students73%
Male60%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners73%

WritingThis School
All Students84%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White86%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis School
All Students73%
Male65%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Not economically disadvantaged76%
Students without disabilities77%
Not English language learners73%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students85%
Male85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners87%

ScienceThis School
All Students94%
Male90%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White92%
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners97%

WritingThis School
All Students82%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White80%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners84%

MathThis School
All Students67%
Male70%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White68%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students without disabilities69%
Not English language learners68%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners85%

WritingThis School
All Students82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners82%

MathThis School
All Students82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged86%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners82%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 7
ReadingThis School
All Students94%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White96%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners94%

WritingThis School
All Students91%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners91%

MathThis School
All Students97%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged97%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners97%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 8
ReadingThis School
All Students82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners82%

ScienceThis School
All Students85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged93%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners85%

WritingThis School
All Students63%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White70%
Not economically disadvantaged69%
Students without disabilities74%
Not English language learners63%

MathThis School
All Students82%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities93%
Not English language learners82%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Integrated Day Charter School?

Rocket Fuel