Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 83% (2008)
 76% (2007)
 74% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 95% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 95% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 95% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 76% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 91% (2008)
 93% (2007)
 86% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 83% (2008)
 93% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 86% (2008)
 83% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 91% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 95% (2008)
 94% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 98% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 77% (2008)
 87% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 79% (2008)
 91% (2007)
 73% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 86% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students83%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities84%
Not English language learners83%

WritingThis School
All Students95%
Male96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White97%
Not economically disadvantaged97%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners95%

MathThis School
All Students95%
Male96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White94%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners95%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students76%
Female73%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White75%
Not economically disadvantaged78%
Students without disabilities78%
Not English language learners77%

WritingThis School
All Students91%
Female96%
Male85%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Not economically disadvantaged91%
Students without disabilities92%
Not English language learners92%

MathThis School
All Students83%
Female89%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities86%
Not English language learners85%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students86%
Female91%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White88%
Not economically disadvantaged85%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners86%

ScienceThis School
All Students91%
Female100%
Male80%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White94%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities90%
Not English language learners91%

WritingThis School
All Students95%
Female100%
Male90%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White97%
Not economically disadvantaged94%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners95%

MathThis School
All Students98%
Female100%
Male95%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities98%
Not English language learners98%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students77%
Female88%
Male69%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners77%

WritingThis School
All Students79%
Female92%
Male69%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Not economically disadvantaged78%
Students without disabilities83%
Not English language learners79%

MathThis School
All Students86%
Female96%
Male78%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White85%
Not economically disadvantaged87%
Students without disabilities91%
Not English language learners86%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Sunnyside School?

Rocket Fuel