LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:
| EOG Results |
Scale: % at or above proficient
Grade 6
Reading
 78% (2011)
 84% (2010)
69% (2009)
67% (2008)
94% (2007)
87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 75% in 2011.
Math
93% (2011)
88% (2010)
85% (2009)
68% (2008)
73% (2007)
72% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 7
Reading
79% (2011)
62% (2010)
77% (2009)
67% (2008)
>95% (2007)
87% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2011.
Math
>95% (2011)
62% (2010)
79% (2009)
67% (2008)
75% (2007)
79% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2011.
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 8
Reading
65% (2011)
64% (2010)
74% (2009)
54% (2008)
88% (2007)
94% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2011.
Science
83% (2011)
79% (2010)
85% (2009)
63% (2008)
The state average for Science was 75% in 2011.
Math
73% (2011)
69% (2010)
80% (2009)
71% (2008)
70% (2007)
76% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2011.
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 10
Reading
 Data not available for this school (2011)
The state average for Reading was 67% in 2011.
Writing
60% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.
Math
Data not available for this school (2011)
The state average for Math was 61% in 2011.
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
About the Tests
- In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
- The EOG is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined
for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
- Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
- The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.
Testing in North Carolina: An Overview
See North Carolina's state standards
|
|
Back to top >
|
| EOG Results by Subgroup |
The test results by subgroup show how the designated
group of students is performing in comparison to the general
population.
Scale: % at or above proficient
Grade 6
| All Students | 78% |
| Female | 91% |
| Male | 65% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 78% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 78% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 78% |
| Students with disabilities | 50% |
| Non-disabled students | 85% |
| Not limited English proficient | 78% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 93% |
| Female | >95% |
| Male | 90% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 95% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 89% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | >95% |
| Students with disabilities | 75% |
| Non-disabled students | >95% |
| Not limited English proficient | 95% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 7
| All Students | 79% |
| Female | 79% |
| Male | 79% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 77% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 77% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 81% |
| Students with disabilities | 57% |
| Non-disabled students | 85% |
| Not limited English proficient | 79% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | >95% |
| Female | >95% |
| Male | 95% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | >95% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 94% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | >95% |
| Students with disabilities | >95% |
| Non-disabled students | >95% |
| Not limited English proficient | >95% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 8
| All Students | 65% |
| Female | 69% |
| Male | 59% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 67% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 65% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 64% |
| Students with disabilities | 56% |
| Non-disabled students | 67% |
| Not limited English proficient | 67% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 83% |
| Female | 85% |
| Male | 82% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 86% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 87% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 80% |
| Students with disabilities | 89% |
| Non-disabled students | 82% |
| Not limited English proficient | 87% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 73% |
| Female | 77% |
| Male | 68% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 76% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 65% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 80% |
| Students with disabilities | 56% |
| Non-disabled students | 77% |
| Not limited English proficient | 76% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
Grade 10
| Subgroup results not available | |
| All Students | 60% |
| Female | 84% |
| Male | 38% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 63% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 44% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 73% |
| Students with disabilities | 29% |
| Non-disabled students | 67% |
| Not limited English proficient | 63% |
| Academically gifted | 88% |
| Subgroup results not available | |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
About the Tests
- In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, grades 5 and 8 in science, and grade 10 in writing.
- The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined
for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
- Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
- The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are
fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
- The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.
Testing in North Carolina: An Overview
|
|
Back to top >
|
| EOC Results |
Scale: % at or above proficient
Algebra I
57% (2011)
73% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 77% in 2011.
Algebra II
69% (2011)
74% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.
English I
79% (2011)
85% (2010)
The state average for English I was 81% in 2011.
Biology
74% (2011)
88% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 80% in 2011.
United States History
64% (2011)
86% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.
Physical Science
93% (2011)
80% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.
Civics and Economics
76% (2011)
73% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.
Geometry
69% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
About the Tests
- In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, and economics.
- The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills
defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
- The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.
Testing in North Carolina: An Overview
See North Carolina's state standards
|
|
Back to top >
|
| EOC Results by Subgroup |
The test results by subgroup show how the designated
group of students is performing in comparison to the general
population.
Scale: % at or above proficient
| All Students | 57% |
| Female | 62% |
| Male | 52% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 60% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 55% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 59% |
| Students with disabilities | 20% |
| Non-disabled students | 65% |
| Not limited English proficient | 60% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
| All Students | 69% |
| Female | 77% |
| Male | 60% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 73% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 50% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 77% |
| Non-disabled students | 72% |
| Not limited English proficient | 71% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 79% |
| Female | 86% |
| Male | 74% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 77% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 82% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 77% |
| Students with disabilities | 33% |
| Non-disabled students | 91% |
| Not limited English proficient | 78% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 74% |
| Female | 69% |
| Male | 79% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 79% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 46% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 94% |
| Non-disabled students | 76% |
| Not limited English proficient | 80% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 64% |
| Female | 56% |
| Male | 70% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 60% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 50% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 72% |
| Non-disabled students | 63% |
| Not limited English proficient | 64% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
| All Students | 93% |
| Male | 90% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | n/a |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 90% |
| Economically disadvantaged | >95% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 83% |
| Non-disabled students | >95% |
| Not limited English proficient | 92% |
| All Students | 76% |
| Female | 71% |
| Male | 80% |
| Black | n/a |
| Asian | n/a |
| Hispanic | 50% |
| Multiracial | n/a |
| American Indian | n/a |
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander | n/a |
| White | 80% |
| Economically disadvantaged | 57% |
| Not economically disadvantaged | 92% |
| Non-disabled students | 74% |
| Not limited English proficient | 79% |
| Academically gifted | >95% |
Source: NCDPI, 2010-2011
About the Tests
- In 2010-2011 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
- The results for algebra I, algebra II, English I, biology, United States history, physical science, economics, and geometry are
displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
- The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills
defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
- The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are
fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
- The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.
|
|
Back to top >
|
|
