Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Todd Beamer High School

Public | 9-12 | 1810 students

Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
No new ratings
2012:
Based on 2 ratings
2011:
No new ratings
2010:
No new ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

21 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted November 20, 2012

I think this is a good school with teachers that will work with the students. A school is what you make it and if as a parent you are involved it's a win win situation.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 28, 2012

My advice to all who aren't interested in their child being a cheerleader is to transfer from this school immediately. Certainly if you are expecting your child to either have a successful college experience or to gain some vocational skills that would allow them to earn a living wage. University of Washington places the graduates of this school in the lowest category.


Posted October 6, 2009

I love Todd Beamer because of all our school spirit !
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 6, 2009

it has the best group work everyone is soo nice and we need the money(:
—Submitted by a parent


Posted December 20, 2008

I graduated from todd beamer in 2008 from the math science health and fitness academy. if some one asked me if beamer is a good school to go to i would say YES! i loved it. the teachers are so great, they care about the students and their futures. want proof? a friend of mine knew no one that went to college and had no clue about financial aid for it. a teacher, not just the career service lady. this teacher met with my friend and his mom and helped him through EVERYTHING. i was also a cheerleader at beamer and the coach is great. i have also met many of the other coaches and they are really nice. the sports teams arent that great but the students and the coaches do their best. the academies are alright but not bad. its a great school and i'd recommend it.
—Submitted by a student


Posted October 12, 2008

My children are the best evidence. My son, a 2008 graduate, had his choice of 7 merit scholarships. He attends the engineering school at the University of Portland and reports he is very well prepared for calculus, physics, philosophy and his other courses. My daughter, a 10th grader, splits her time between running on the Titan's winning cross country team and home work in her rigorous courses. She has a very strong relationship with her teachers and coaches, which contributes to her academic success. She took and passed the WASL as freshman.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 8, 2008

I have had such a positive experience so far. My daughter has special needs that were not being met in a nearby district at all. Beamer and its staff were challenged by our needs in that my daughter does not qualify for IEP classes. She is in regular classes with accommodations. Her teachers communicate with me without giving me the impression that it is too much to do so. She is getting more help with work than she ever did from the other district right next to them. As for the academies, I think they are great. Yes, they socially lump the kids together, but the kids do that anyway. It keeps the jocks from picking on the nerds so to speak. They still have problems, but what public school doesn't.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 16, 2008

I believe that Beamer is New and as new schools go, it has problems. When you attend Beamer, Don't expect to get the same kind of social treatment that you would expect at a traditinal High School. Beamer is broken down into four academys. Each academy has it's own identity, the problem is if you don't pick the academy that fits your personality, you have a problem, that is what I see. If you are not into sports, you would not enjoy being in the Math Science Health and Fitness Academy, not to say that you are not getting a good education. You Get that from each academy. What the differece between each is the social life.
—Submitted by a student


Posted June 12, 2008

I am a ex-student from Beamer and I agree its in a bad neiborhood like the other highschools but go to Federal Way High and say this one is not safe. It is over crowded compared to when I started there and some teachers are over rated but the B&I principl changed my life and is continuing to do so, both in and out of school even after my not going there he is still a friend of mine and many of the teachers do get involved with each student maybe even too involved, but they have our best interests at heart.
—Submitted by a student


Posted July 6, 2007

the teachers are not involved in the students, as with the administration. the student discipline system is amazingly horrible. a couple of teachers are doing what they should be doing, but the rest have either given up on the students or just don't care about the students. just themselves. I think the academies are just incredibly stupid. if you are in one academy you cannot take a any-other classes in the other academies. all academies have different classes.. so if you seem that you may want to go in a couple directions.... you cannot; because the school doesn't allow it. I highly recommend studying the academies before you send yourself or your children into this school. also the main focus is on sports and not academics.
—Submitted by a student


Posted May 31, 2007

Not such a great school, this school is way over-rated, and not safe at all. This website needs to rethink their 9 out of 10 rating, because they are wrong.
—Submitted by a student


Posted February 28, 2007

This school is great because the teachers are so involved with the students. They're not just like heres the work and say go ahead and do it they care about the students. After school sports are improving drastically almost all our sports made it to state and one took third and this year the soccer team has a great chance in state.
—Submitted by a student


Posted February 13, 2006

horrible school, bad disipline system, overcrowded, pathetic sports and academics, and worst of all, the academys: lets split the school up into 4 different schools and limit the classes kids can take, for example, if i was in the math science academy, i couldnt take creative writing or drama because they are part of humanities and arts and if i joined that academy i couldnt take marketing or buisness math becuase they are in buisness and industry
—Submitted by a student


Posted December 22, 2005

This school is a disaster for kids that are seeking to enter college or for kids that wish to find a vocation. Emphasis here seems to be on 'social interaction' not learning.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 29, 2005

The academys are a waste of time and should be eliminated.
—Submitted by a student


Posted October 28, 2005

This school has the lowest SAT scores in the district along with the lowest participation rates. Parents that are expecting their kids to attend competitive colleges might wish to look elsewhere.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 6, 2005

Todd Beamer is a nice school with new facilities that allow students to learn at the hightest level possible. Though it is somewhat trial and error because it is only in its second year, there is a large amount of promising evidence.
—Submitted by a student


Posted February 2, 2005

I am currently a Junior at Todd Beamer, I have been there two years now and from my firsthand experience of this school is great. I like it because it is indoor and fairly big. The teachers are great, and the students are respectable. I have been to some after school activites and there wasn't alot of school spirit. I think that is because we are a new school and we don't have any traditions. I believe that in ten to twenty yeas from now, this school will even better. Its a great learning environment. I am the graduating class of 2006.
—Submitted by a student


Posted January 26, 2005

I have deep concern over whether this school has the ability to foster children who are disabled. The school did not take into consideration the amount of students that would be flooding this school. It is overcrowded and absurd to have small class sizes when the school is over 1400 kids. I would eat my eyes before sending my children to this school. Although, I might add that their speech and debate team is superb.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 6, 2004

This is my first year at Beamer and so far I am deeply concerned. I see the potential that this school could provide and the people in leadership I have met I have liked so far. They have a great program to help put these kids on track for early graduation and getting a head start in their college choices, however, it is very difficult to make the system work for you because of how over-crowded the school is. This is not just a nuisance but a real problem in the success of the school and its students. I will have a total of 3 students attending Todd Beamer High and am hoping that the system can iron out its wrinkles in time to help these students succeed!
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 56% in 2012.

179 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
26%

2011

 
 
30%
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 81% in 2012.

72 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
81%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 91% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
77%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 45% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 94% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 27% in 2012.

26 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
15%

2011

 
 
16%
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 61% in 2012.

406 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
39%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 59% in 2012.

127 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
43%

2011

 
 
36%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 23% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 36% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 27% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
23%
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 44% in 2012.

19 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
37%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 37% in 2012.

41 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
32%

2011

 
 
13%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 15% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 21% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 20% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 36% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 27% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 29% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Students26%
Female26%
Male25%
Black19%
Asian69%
Asian/Pacific Islander55%
Hispanic19%
Multiracial28%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White24%
Low income24%
Not low income30%
Special educationn/a
Not special education30%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Students81%
Female80%
Male81%
Blackn/a
Asian72%
Asian/Pacific Islander73%
Hispanic64%
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White96%
Low income85%
Not low income78%
Special educationn/a
Not special education83%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Geometry

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Black83%
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic71%
Multiracial87%
Pacific Islandern/a
Whiten/a
Low income71%
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Students15%
Female36%
Male0%
Blackn/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low income11%
Not low incomen/a
Special education10%
Not special education19%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Students39%
Female40%
Male39%
Black21%
Asian43%
Asian/Pacific Islander40%
Hispanic22%
Multiracial26%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islander25%
White52%
Low income34%
Not low income44%
Special education6%
Not special education45%
Limited English0%
Migrantn/a

Geometry

All Students43%
Female32%
Male54%
Black20%
Asian36%
Asian/Pacific Islander37%
Hispanic38%
Multiracial40%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White58%
Low income42%
Not low income44%
Special educationn/a
Not special education43%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Students37%
Femalen/a
Male33%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low income39%
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special education44%
Limited Englishn/a

Geometry

All Students32%
Female43%
Male20%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic33%
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Whiten/a
Low income22%
Not low income44%
Special educationn/a
Not special education32%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Biology I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a

Geometry

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Whiten/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

The state average for Math was 42% in 2010.

419 students were tested at this school in 2010.

2010

 
 
50%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 81% in 2012.

440 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
79%

2011

 
 
81%

2010

 
 
80%
Science

The state average for Science was 50% in 2011.

462 students were tested at this school in 2011.

2011

 
 
40%

2010

 
 
43%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 85% in 2012.

430 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
84%

2011

 
 
84%

2010

 
 
85%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to test students in reading and writing in grade 10. Math skills are tested by the End-of-Course (EOC) exams. The HSPE is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Reading

All Students79%
Female80%
Male78%
Black69%
Asian85%
Asian/Pacific Islander79%
Hispanic71%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islander42%
White86%
Low income72%
Not low income85%
Special education47%
Not special education85%
Limited English16%
Migrantn/a

Writing

All Students84%
Female88%
Male80%
Black72%
Asian88%
Asian/Pacific Islander87%
Hispanic87%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islander75%
White87%
Low income78%
Not low income89%
Special education56%
Not special education89%
Limited English40%
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to test students in reading and writing in grade 10. Math skills are tested by the End-of-Course (EOC) exams. The HSPE is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
White 54% 64%
Asian/Pacific Islander 20% 9%
Black 13% 6%
Hispanic 10% 16%
Native American 1% 3%
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 38%N/A42%
Special education 11%N/A13%
Transitional bilingual 5%N/A8%
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per classroom teacher 22N/A17
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher experience

  This school District averageState average
Average years educational experience 8N/A12
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher education levels

  This school District averageState average
Master's degree or higher 67%N/A66%
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

35999 16th Av South
Federal Way, WA 98003
Phone: (253) 945-2570

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare

Nearby schools


Merit School
Federal Way, WA



Internet Academy
Federal Way, WA



Support School
Federal Way, WA


ADVERTISEMENT