Avielle was 6 when she was murdered. The daughter of Jennifer Hensel and Jeremy Richman, Avielle was one of the 20 children and six adults slain at Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012. The tragedy sparked new debates about gun law, violent video games, and mental health. But Jennifer and Jeremy, both scientists, didn’t want to debate; they wanted to understand what could lead a person to such violence and what could be done to prevent it. “We needed a reason to crawl out of bed every day,” Richman says. They began channeling their expertise into brain research to find out what makes people perform violent acts. Their goal is to prevent violence.
You might think their first step would be to ban video games, but it isn’t. Although gaming was often sited as part of the cause of the Sandy Hook tragedy, Hensel and Richman can see gaming being part of the solution. They launched the Avielle Foundation, named for their late daughter, and they’re committed to preventing violence and building compassion through brain health research, community education, and engagement.
At a conference Richman met Jessica Berlinski, Chief Impact Officer of Personalized Learning Games (PLG), who was using games to boost social and emotional skills in kids and teens. “She was applying SEL to video games,” Richman recalls. “It was genius.” An instant connection grew as they saw the intertwining of their purposes — building healthy, emotionally intelligent brains through gaming.
Richman and Berlinski discussed gaming as a social and emotional learning tool during a GreatSchools Google+ Hangout.
Here are six interesting points made during the Hangout and separate interviews.
Chock full of potential
When it comes to learning potential, video games have a lot going for them.
- They’re popular: the vast majority of kids already enjoy playing some kind of electronic game. The education community can take advantage of this mass appeal.
- They allow targeting: the so-called “sweet spot” of education is giving a child a lesson that’s just one step up from where he is. Video games already use that bait with incremental advancement. And players respond to it, find it motivating, and constantly choose to keep playing.
- The failure and the victory: we know failing and trying again (aka perseverance) is key to so much in learning, yet kids get so few chances to fail and try again. Video games are the exception to that rule, however. Gamers are losing most of the time. And yet they persist. The goal of targeted games will be to move this quality from video games to real life.
See this discussion at 2:43 and 3:05.
Games can build social skills
We don’t think of tech devices as being able to build real-world social skills. Inherently, they don’t: they can be isolating and decrease kids’ compassion. However, studies have found social and emotional skills can be improved through gaming. For example, Zoo U has been proven to boost six core social skills: impulse control, empathy, initiation, communication, cooperation and emotion regulation. These are life skills — self-awareness and self-management, communication, perseverance, decision-making. Role-playing games are another example, as they provide a rich and safe environment for building a core emotional learning skill: empathy.
See this discussion at 10:30 and 29:30.
Why do games work?
Games are this rich environment where it’s OK to fail but you’re given the belief that you can win. You’re set up for winning, and losing doesn’t mean you’re defeated. Mostly they fail, but they keep trying and they improve, and they keep trying because they believe they can win. Belief system is important. In gaming, they have a mindset of “if I try harder, I will become smarter, I will win.” Belief leads to better performance.
It’s like a drug… or sugar
Just like food, games can be healthy or unhealthy. They can have an addictive quality. The feeling of victory that comes from leveling-up in a game comes from the pleasure center of your brain. And your brain will seek more, reinforcing the behavior. That does not have to be a negative thing.
See this discussion at 28:19.
The Avielle Foundation is studying the science behind violence and compassion. They’re striving to understand what goes wrong in the brain that leads to violent behaviors and how we can foster compassion to prevent violence. Gaming likely can contribute to aggressive and violent acts, but done differently, gaming can instead teach empathy and compassion.
See this discussion at 5:28 and 8:25.
Want more? Read our article: Your child’s brain on technology: video games
Can games and great literature play similar roles?
GreatSchools Executive Editor Carol Lloyd points out that games could play a similar role as great literature in that people see the point of view of the bad guys and can empathize with them — and yet, most important, realize they don’t want to be the bad guy.
See this discussion at 31:50.
What’s the right amount of screen time?
For kids under 2 years old, its zip. Nada. None. Or, “Hashtag unplug,” Richman quips. But for other kids, like those with ADHD who find welcome opportunities to deeply focus, and older children who simply love gaming, the guidelines from both Richman and Berlinski are more individualized. “It’s key to interact with your child while engaged with media. It’s not a babysitter,” Richman says. Keep a conversation going and see where your child is emotionally while playing. Berlinski advocates for using your parental intuition. Let your child play, she says, and see how he acts after a few minutes, after a half hour, an hour. When you see your child’s behavior change negatively, you get a pretty clear idea where to set your child’s screen time limits.
See this discussion at 14:40.
Want more? Read our article: 9 secrets to managing your child’s screen time