Image of globe and book on table

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

GreatSchools Rating: 6 out of 10. GreatSchools Ratings are based on test results. 10 is best.
This district's rating is based on its schools' test results; 10 is best. Learn more >

Learn About This District's:

701 East 2nd St
Charlotte, NC 28202
Mecklenburg County
Map >

PH: (980) 343-3000
FAX: (980) 343-7135

  • Grades PK-12 & ungraded
  • 139,972 students
  • 176 schools

View all schools in this district >

Compare top-rated schools in this district:


 EOG Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 47% (2013)
 69% (2012)
 67% (2011)
 68% (2010)
 66% (2009)
 56% (2008)
 82% (2007)
 84% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 45% in 2013.

Math
 50% (2013)
 82% (2012)
 80% (2011)
 82% (2010)
 80% (2009)
 70% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 70% (2006)
The state average for Math was 47% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 4

Reading
 45% (2013)
 71% (2012)
 71% (2011)
 71% (2010)
 70% (2009)
 60% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 44% in 2013.

Math
 52% (2013)
 85% (2012)
 85% (2011)
 83% (2010)
 80% (2009)
 71% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 67% (2006)
The state average for Math was 48% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 5

Reading
 41% (2013)
 74% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 72% (2010)
 69% (2009)
 57% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 88% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 40% in 2013.

Science
 47% (2013)
 75% (2012)
 72% (2011)
 69% (2010)
 60% (2009)
 40% (2008)
The state average for Science was 45% in 2013.

Math
 51% (2013)
 84% (2012)
 83% (2011)
 83% (2010)
 81% (2009)
 72% (2008)
 69% (2007)
 67% (2006)
The state average for Math was 48% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 6

Reading
 48% (2013)
 75% (2012)
 74% (2011)
 74% (2010)
 70% (2009)
 58% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 77% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 46% in 2013.

Math
 43% (2013)
 79% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 79% (2010)
 76% (2009)
 65% (2008)
 62% (2007)
 62% (2006)
The state average for Math was 39% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 7

Reading
 49% (2013)
 68% (2012)
 67% (2011)
 66% (2010)
 63% (2009)
 49% (2008)
 81% (2007)
 82% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 48% in 2013.

Math
 42% (2013)
 80% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 79% (2010)
 75% (2009)
 64% (2008)
 60% (2007)
 58% (2006)
The state average for Math was 39% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 8

Reading
 44% (2013)
 71% (2012)
 70% (2011)
 69% (2010)
 66% (2009)
 51% (2008)
 85% (2007)
 83% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 41% in 2013.

Science
 60% (2013)
 79% (2012)
 75% (2011)
 70% (2010)
 64% (2009)
 47% (2008)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2013.

Math
 40% (2013)
 86% (2012)
 85% (2011)
 84% (2010)
 80% (2009)
 65% (2008)
 63% (2007)
 62% (2006)
The state average for Math was 34% in 2013.

Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 10

Reading
 70% (2012)
 83% (2011)
The state average for Reading was 64% in 2012.

Science
 63% (2012)
The state average for Science was 59% in 2012.

Writing
 74% (2011)
The state average for Writing was 70% in 2011.

Math
 61% (2012)
 78% (2011)
The state average for Math was 56% in 2012.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all elementary and middle schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOG Results By Subgroup

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis District
All Students47%
Female51%
Male43%
Black31%
Asian62%
Hispanic28%
Multiracial53%
American Indian60%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged29%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities14%
Non-disabled students50%
Limited English proficiency17%
Proficient in English51%
Non-migrant47%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students50%
Female52%
Male49%
Black31%
Asian69%
Hispanic40%
Multiracial55%
American Indian50%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students with disabilities15%
Non-disabled students53%
Limited English proficiency32%
Proficient in English53%
Non-migrant50%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 4
ReadingThis District
All Students45%
Female48%
Male43%
Black31%
Asian60%
Hispanic29%
Multiracial50%
American Indian33%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White70%
Economically disadvantaged28%
Not economically disadvantaged67%
Students with disabilities11%
Non-disabled students49%
Limited English proficiency8%
Proficient in English49%
Non-migrant45%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students52%
Female52%
Male52%
Black33%
Asian74%
Hispanic42%
Multiracial59%
American Indian38%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged36%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students with disabilities16%
Non-disabled students56%
Limited English proficiency22%
Proficient in English54%
Non-migrant52%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 5
ReadingThis District
All Students41%
Female42%
Male39%
Black25%
Asian54%
Hispanic25%
Multiracial47%
American Indian35%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White68%
Economically disadvantaged24%
Not economically disadvantaged64%
Students with disabilities10%
Non-disabled students44%
Limited English proficiency5%
Proficient in English43%
Non-migrant41%
Academically gifted-94%

ScienceThis District
All Students47%
Female46%
Male49%
Black30%
Asian65%
Hispanic35%
Multiracial53%
American Indian51%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities14%
Non-disabled students51%
Limited English proficiency11%
Proficient in English50%
Non-migrant47%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students51%
Female52%
Male50%
Black32%
Asian75%
Hispanic44%
Multiracial56%
American Indian49%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged35%
Not economically disadvantaged73%
Students with disabilities13%
Non-disabled students56%
Limited English proficiency21%
Proficient in English54%
Non-migrant51%
Academically gifted-94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 6
ReadingThis District
All Students48%
Female51%
Male45%
Black32%
Asian59%
Hispanic34%
Multiracial54%
American Indian40%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged31%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities10%
Non-disabled students52%
Limited English proficiency6%
Proficient in English50%
Non-migrant48%
Academically gifted95%

MathThis District
All Students43%
Female45%
Male41%
Black24%
Asian65%
Hispanic33%
Multiracial48%
American Indian24%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White70%
Economically disadvantaged26%
Not economically disadvantaged65%
Students with disabilities8%
Non-disabled students47%
Limited English proficiency13%
Proficient in English45%
Non-migrant43%
Academically gifted94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 7
ReadingThis District
All Students49%
Female52%
Male46%
Black33%
Asian63%
Hispanic37%
Multiracial55%
American Indian40%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White75%
Economically disadvantaged33%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities12%
Non-disabled students53%
Limited English proficiency8%
Proficient in English52%
Non-migrant49%
Academically gifted95%

MathThis District
All Students42%
Female44%
Male40%
Black24%
Asian70%
Hispanic31%
Multiracial46%
American Indian34%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White69%
Economically disadvantaged26%
Not economically disadvantaged63%
Students with disabilities7%
Non-disabled students46%
Limited English proficiency12%
Proficient in English44%
Non-migrant42%
Academically gifted94%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

Grade 8
ReadingThis District
All Students44%
Female49%
Male40%
Black29%
Asian56%
Hispanic33%
Multiracial46%
American Indian39%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White70%
Economically disadvantaged28%
Not economically disadvantaged66%
Students with disabilities10%
Non-disabled students48%
Limited English proficiency9%
Proficient in English47%
Non-migrant44%
Academically gifted92%

ScienceThis District
All Students60%
Female60%
Male61%
Black45%
Asian72%
Hispanic50%
Multiracial64%
American Indian59%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White85%
Economically disadvantaged45%
Not economically disadvantaged80%
Students with disabilities25%
Non-disabled students64%
Limited English proficiency26%
Proficient in English63%
Non-migrant60%
Academically gifted-94%

MathThis District
All Students40%
Female41%
Male39%
Black22%
Asian63%
Hispanic28%
Multiracial40%
American Indian31%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White69%
Economically disadvantaged23%
Not economically disadvantaged62%
Students with disabilities9%
Non-disabled students43%
Limited English proficiency12%
Proficient in English42%
Non-migrant40%
Academically gifted92%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Grade (EOG) tests to assess students in grades 3 through 8 and 10 in reading and math, and grades 5 and 8 in science.
  • The EOG tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • Students must pass the grade 8 EOG test in order to graduate from high school.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

Back to top >
 EOC Results

Scale: % at or above proficient

English II
 53% (2013)
The state average for English II was 51% in 2013.

Biology
 48% (2013)
The state average for Biology was 46% in 2013.

Algebra I
 38% (2013)
 75% (2012)
 79% (2011)
 84% (2010)
The state average for Algebra I was 36% in 2013.

Algebra II
 79% (2011)
 85% (2010)
The state average for Algebra II was 82% in 2011.

English I
 83% (2012)
 81% (2011)
 85% (2010)
The state average for English I was 83% in 2012.

Biology
 84% (2012)
 83% (2011)
 85% (2010)
The state average for Biology was 83% in 2012.

United States History
 86% (2011)
 89% (2010)
The state average for United States History was 82% in 2011.

Physical Science
 71% (2011)
 71% (2010)
The state average for Physical Science was 77% in 2011.

Civics and Economics
 82% (2011)
 83% (2010)
The state average for Civics and Economics was 80% in 2011.

Geometry
 84% (2010)
The state average for Geometry was 82% in 2010.

Source: NCDPI, 2011-2012

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in Algebra I, English I, and Biology.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Testing in North Carolina: An Overview

See North Carolina's state standards

Compare all high schools in this district

Back to top >
 EOC Results By Subgroup

 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient


English IIThis District
All Students53%
Female59%
Male48%
Black39%
Asian57%
Hispanic43%
Multiracial60%
American Indian50%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander80%
White78%
Economically disadvantaged38%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students with disabilities14%
Non-disabled students58%
Limited English proficiency7%
Proficient in English56%
Non-migrant53%
Academically gifted94%

BiologyThis District
All Students48%
Female47%
Male49%
Black30%
Asian60%
Hispanic38%
Multiracial58%
American Indian43%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White74%
Economically disadvantaged32%
Not economically disadvantaged65%
Students with disabilities17%
Non-disabled students51%
Limited English proficiency11%
Proficient in English50%
Non-migrant48%
Academically gifted88%

Algebra IThis District
All Students38%
Female39%
Male38%
Black20%
Asian63%
Hispanic28%
Multiracial44%
American Indian22%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islandern/a
White67%
Economically disadvantaged23%
Not economically disadvantaged58%
Students with disabilities9%
Non-disabled students41%
Limited English proficiency13%
Proficient in English41%
Non-migrant38%
Academically gifted93%
Source: NCDPI, 2012-2013

About the Tests

  • In 2011-2012 North Carolina used End-of-Course (EOC) tests to assess high school students in various subjects.
  • The results for Algebra I, English I, and Biology are displayed on GreatSchools profiles.
  • The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of North Carolina.
  • The different student groups are identified by the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, data for that group is not reported.
  • The goal is for all students to score at or above the proficient level on the tests.

Back to top >
 Teachers

 
Teacher data was not reported for this district.

Back to top >
 Students

 
Student Ethnicity
Information about this data
Source:
EthnicityThis DistrictState Average
Unspecified100%n/a

Back to top >
 Spending Per Pupil

 

Finance data was not reported for this district.

Back to top >