Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 61% (2008)
 78% (2007)
 80% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 55% (2008)
 71% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 68% (2008)
 88% (2007)
 87% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 73% (2008)
 95% (2007)
 75% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 87% (2008)
 100% (2007)
 92% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 91% (2008)
 98% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 89% (2008)
 80% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 97% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 100% (2008)
 83% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 100% (2008)
 91% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 92% (2008)
 89% (2007)
 79% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 81% (2008)
 96% (2007)
 91% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 100% (2008)
 98% (2007)
 100% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students61%
Female68%
Male55%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White69%
Not economically disadvantaged68%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners62%

WritingThis School
All Students55%
Female50%
Male59%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White54%
Not economically disadvantaged60%
Students without disabilities60%
Not English language learners52%

MathThis School
All Students68%
Female73%
Male64%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White74%
Not economically disadvantaged72%
Students without disabilities73%
Not English language learners71%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students73%
Female71%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White76%
Economically disadvantaged60%
Not economically disadvantaged84%
Students without disabilities80%
Not English language learners75%

WritingThis School
All Students87%
Female91%
Male83%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White84%
Economically disadvantaged80%
Not economically disadvantaged92%
Students without disabilities95%
Not English language learners86%

MathThis School
All Students91%
Female95%
Male88%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White89%
Economically disadvantaged85%
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities98%
Not English language learners91%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students89%
Female84%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White97%
Not economically disadvantaged88%
Students without disabilities89%
Not English language learners89%

ScienceThis School
All Students97%
Female96%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged96%
Students without disabilities97%
Not English language learners97%

WritingThis School
All Students100%
Female100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%

MathThis School
All Students100%
Female100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students92%
Male92%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White90%
Not economically disadvantaged89%
Students without disabilities94%
Not English language learners92%

WritingThis School
All Students81%
Male75%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White77%
Not economically disadvantaged78%
Students without disabilities85%
Not English language learners83%

MathThis School
All Students100%
Male100%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White100%
Not economically disadvantaged100%
Students without disabilities100%
Not English language learners100%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Enfield Street School?

Rocket Fuel