Image of pencil and books on table

LEARN ABOUT THIS SCHOOL'S:


 
  CMT Results
 
Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3

Reading
 52% (2008)
 45% (2007)
 40% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 68% in 2008.

Writing
 73% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 67% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 59% (2008)
 49% (2007)
 41% (2006)
The state average for Math was 81% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4

Reading
 35% (2008)
 53% (2007)
 41% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 70% in 2008.

Writing
 55% (2008)
 57% (2007)
 61% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 85% in 2008.

Math
 47% (2008)
 61% (2007)
The state average for Math was 82% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5

Reading
 63% (2008)
 52% (2007)
The state average for Reading was 74% in 2008.

Science
 75% (2008)
The state average for Science was 81% in 2008.

Writing
 66% (2008)
 70% (2007)
 64% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 86% in 2008.

Math
 66% (2008)
 59% (2007)
 49% (2006)
The state average for Math was 83% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6

Reading
 66% (2008)
 71% (2007)
 68% (2006)
The state average for Reading was 78% in 2008.

Writing
 57% (2008)
 64% (2007)
 81% (2006)
The state average for Writing was 83% in 2008.

Math
 81% (2008)
 71% (2007)
 72% (2006)
The state average for Math was 84% in 2008.

Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview

See Connecticut's state standards

Compare with test results from nearby schools  

Back to top >
  CMT Results By Subgroup
 
The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.

Scale: % at or above proficient

Grade 3
ReadingThis School
All Students52%
Male56%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White60%
Economically disadvantaged32%
Not economically disadvantaged75%
Students without disabilities60%
Not English language learners55%

WritingThis School
All Students73%
Male71%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White72%
Economically disadvantaged52%
Not economically disadvantaged95%
Students without disabilities81%
Not English language learners72%

MathThis School
All Students59%
Male63%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White67%
Economically disadvantaged44%
Not economically disadvantaged76%
Students without disabilities68%
Not English language learners62%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 4
ReadingThis School
All Students35%
Female50%
Male17%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White47%
Economically disadvantaged23%
Students without disabilities41%
Not English language learners39%

WritingThis School
All Students55%
Female67%
Male41%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White62%
Economically disadvantaged46%
Students without disabilities63%
Not English language learners58%

MathThis School
All Students47%
Female54%
Male39%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White50%
Economically disadvantaged34%
Students without disabilities55%
Not English language learners50%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 5
ReadingThis School
All Students63%
Female59%
Male68%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White64%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Not economically disadvantaged70%
Students without disabilities68%
Not English language learners63%

ScienceThis School
All Students75%
Female77%
Male72%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White73%
Economically disadvantaged66%
Not economically disadvantaged83%
Students without disabilities79%
Not English language learners75%

WritingThis School
All Students66%
Female71%
Male60%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White64%
Economically disadvantaged59%
Not economically disadvantaged73%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners65%

MathThis School
All Students66%
Female65%
Male68%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White64%
Economically disadvantaged55%
Not economically disadvantaged77%
Students without disabilities70%
Not English language learners67%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

Grade 6
ReadingThis School
All Students66%
Female76%
Male58%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White70%
Economically disadvantaged59%
Students without disabilities69%
Not English language learners71%

WritingThis School
All Students57%
Female67%
Male50%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White64%
Economically disadvantaged48%
Students without disabilities60%
Not English language learners62%

MathThis School
All Students81%
Female95%
Male69%
Blackn/a
Asian Americann/a
Hispanicn/a
American Indiann/a
White82%
Economically disadvantaged76%
Students without disabilities82%
Not English language learners83%
Source: CT Dept. of Education, 2007-2008

About the Tests

  • In 2007-2008 Connecticut used the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) to test students' skills in reading, writing and math in grades 3 through 8, and in science in grades 5 and 8.
  • The CMT is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Connecticut.
  • The different student groups are identified by the Connecticut Department of Education. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Testing in Connecticut: An Overview  

Back to top >
How challenging is Lafayette School?

Rocket Fuel