Advertisement
Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Seattle Hill Elementary School

Public | K-6 | 89 students

 
 

In the know: Get our expert advice on schools

No articles are available

Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2014:
No new ratings
2013:
Based on 2 ratings
2012:
Based on 14 ratings
2011:
Based on 10 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Registration is required to post your anonymous review
We will not display your name, photo or email address with your review.
OR
Your email address will never be published or shared.
Indicates a required field

44 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted November 17, 2013

After reading the reviews of this school, I think I will enroll my children in one of the nearby private schools such as Cedar Park or Brighton.


Posted October 9, 2013

This school could improve with consistency between grade levels and even within the same grade level. Writers workshop with some classrooms, none at all with others. Spelling with some grades and vocabulary with others. Book reports each month or none at all. Math is very disjointed, I don't know how to help as a parent. I wish the school would send out expectations for homework. Many nights nothing at all.


Posted October 12, 2012

The success of any school must be measured in terms of student experience and the growth and development of students while they are at school. We have been very satisfied with our child s teachers as the energy of SHE is focused where it should be, on students. However, as citizens of the Snohomish school district, we believe schools ought to remain independent of politics. Like-minded individuals may not like the current atmosphere at SHE because parents (not staff) continue to push political agendas regarding state mandated testing and budget issues; views shared via mass media and informal dialogue. The principal is very level-headed and fair. With effective leadership, she will unify the school community back to the primary focus of school: student learning and achievement. Of course we respect individual rights and freedoms to express, but feel our school community ought to focus on COMMON goals and interests of children while remaining politically NEUTRAL. We are an involved and supportive family and care greatly for SHE staff and students. We do not feel parental politicizing is appropriate in a school setting.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 9, 2012

Seattle Hill is a great school, there is a sense of community among the families. There are a few parents that try to push their own agenda and do not take the students into consideration. This school, the teachers and the principal are only out for one thing, the education and well being of our children. Teachers go out of the way to look out for students. My childrenare better off at Seattle Hill than any other elementary school in the district. I would recommend Seattle Hill to anyone that asks. If people are so unhappy, they can always change schools, you are not required to stay if you are so unhappy. Mrs. Nelson should be proud of the job she and her staff are doing!!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 5, 2012

Maybe the parent who posted the playground equipment comment should attend pto meetings and become educated on where pto funds are being spent. Yes. they are working on purchasing some new playground equipment. These pieces of equipment cost ten of thousand of dollars and they are working towards that. They also forgot to mention that all of the fundraising money has been used to purchase new computers for EVERY CLASSROOM, pays for transportation so that children can go on field trips, buys new books for your library, purchase new curriculum for the school, provides student planners for every student, emergency kits for every student and even replace benches that our rotting!!! and much much more. The facts our that our school are not being funded properly by our state as they are required to do and fundraising money is being used just to keep the school running. We are lucky to have parents support the fundraising efforts that allow the school to do the above and much much more.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 5, 2012

I agree with the last comment. So many uninformed parents. Wish they would come out to a meeting or volunteer some time. I have zero complaints about my child's education with the exception of class room sizes. That is not the schools fault. I believe many other schools in the are are worse off. And opting out of standardized testing is a great idea. This test serves no purpose to the child and takes millions dollars away from teachers, classrooms, and special programs. If more parents followed suit we could get this money back into our schools where they belong. Do not hesitate to send your child to this school. If your child is willing to do the work they will learn at this school. The teachers are great!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 5, 2012

In response to the most recent comments:Snohomish School District parents as a whole (not just SHE parents) chose to opt their children out of MSP testing.This was a community grass roots effort to make our concerns loud and clear to our state representatives.IT WORKED!We now have legislation being worked on to fully fund our children's education as our state constitution requires.These efforts were made by parents who are educated, smart, and care deeply about current and future quality of education for their children.The SHE staff is OUTSTANDING.We have not had a poor experience with any staff at SHE.Parents at SHE are dedicated to supporting their school in many ways.Some dontate time by being in the classroom or helping out at events during the year.Others make monetary donations.Each family at SHE supports this school in the ways they can make the most positive impact! Playground equipment is a longterm project and will be funded over time just like technology in the classrooms was.Spending 100K takes time.The money must be raised before it can be spent. I suggest if you don't like something, GET INVOLVED and make a positive change at school instead of complaining anonymously.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted October 4, 2012

The playground needs upgrades and improvements. PTO said fundraising was to pay for recess play structures. We havent' seen any changes.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 15, 2012

If you are moving to the Snohomish area, use extreme caution if your children will attend Seattle Hill Elementary. Check your boundaries! There are some good teachers, but unfortunately it doesn't make up for the dysfunctional way in which the school is run. Look to move into the region covered by Little Cedars or Totem Falls. Test scores have dropped significantly at Seattle Hill, and parent financial support is sliding negatively. Without a strong academic vision with focused student goals in mind, it is difficult to provide financial support to school which is in free fall decline. We are tired of the continuous fundraising campaigns which unfortunately are hot helping build student success. Needs top down improvement.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 31, 2012

SHE ranks 975/1003 elementary schools in the state of WA.Ranking change of 599 points from 2011-2012. Why?Because a portion of the parent group refused to have their children take the MSP to protest state budget cuts.By doing so, the entire school FAILED TO MAKE PROGRESS.Testing is required by state and fed law.This protest lacked common sense, integrity, and responsible behavior.Parents flock to academically PROGRESIVE schools, strengthening community bonds and enhancing school culture. SHE must be an anomoly.It has great kids, effective teachers and decent specialized programs.What it lacks is a UNIFIED parent support base.Teachers are doing their best to TEACH, students are LEARNING, but MSP Opt-Out parent actions affected the entire school NEGATIVELY.This is NOT support, this is APATHY.Over time SHE has demonstrated PROGRESSION via mandated assessments despite budget cuts. Suggestion:Define and focus educational goals, further develop parent support activities to assist students/teachers perhaps w/afterschool activities/tutoring, and EDUCATE parents about the purpose and value of instruction and assessment . No one is arguing fully funded education, it is the LAW.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 27, 2012

Our child had a teacher for 3rd grade this past year, who, although he seemed to try and have a solid curriculum for the children, was overwhelmed with the number of students, and relied heavily upon the children using an answer sheet posted on the white board, and the children correcting each other's math papers -- not a good idea for 3rd graders. Many "corrections" were incorrect. Also, he used this same process for writing papers, which was a joke. The kids would "rewrite" sections of each other's work, and it would be worse than what the child originally wrote. Also had a problem with snotty language toward the children. -- We had high hopes in the beginning for this new teacher; dashed by December. Teache 's ego writing checks that his abilities couldn't cash. Very sad. Very troubling. Very dissappointing. What's going on here?
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 24, 2012

Athough teachers say they use 6-Trait program, our kids did not receive workshop model with skill focus. Non-fictional writing (reports) is the main emphasis- report after report. Spelling lessons are dropped in upper grades. Students are expected to spell vocabulary words soundly, but gone are prefix, suffix, root words and spelling rules. Unfortunately writing is not a comrehensive model in upper grades. Grading: With semester grade parents are left in the dark with student progress for months. Although parent conferences are helpful, reported student progress is very inconsistent Homework is very inconsistent too. Random no homework tonight , 30 minutes on occassion, 60+ minutes? Ridiculous swings. Parents are active and influential.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 4, 2012

I've had four kids at Seattle Hill and have yet to have a negative experience with a teacher. All of them love school, have grown in their peer relationships and have continued to excel after moving on to Middle School. The principal has consistently exhibited leadership at the school. Her teachers love her, the parents that I have talked to respect her and she has a great connection with the students as well. Our experience at Seattle Hill could not have been better. While we have never been involved with any of the parent groups, I would agree with other posts about the amount of fund raising that is sent home...however, I think that simply represents a group of parents that are working hard to bring about improvements and other opportunities for the staff and students.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 1, 2012

poor leadership, rude and exclusionary parent group, gossiping female cliques at the local coffee shop, ok teachers but academics are minimally challenging, notices home are routinely late, this school looks and feels disorganized and sloppy,


Posted May 16, 2012

Is Mrs Sketcher (sp) still there? She was my 2nd grade teacher. To put it simply, she was verbally abusive to me. Even though it has been 20+ years, I still remember her screaming at me, the name calling, etc. I was also pushed from behind and had my front teeth knocked out. The nurse was irritated that I was crying and told me to be quiet. Those three years of school at Seattle Hill damaged me in school for the next 9. It took till college for me to like and do well in school again. Thought you all might want a childs perspective.


Posted January 23, 2012

Curriculum could be better, parents are a snobby bunch, teachers do the minimum, though that may not be their fault as they can only do so much with a limited budget.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 3, 2011

This is my child's second year at this school and I am still very unimpressed. While the office staff is very friendly, I find many of the teachers very rude, including my child's teacher. The teacher never smiles, gives very short answers when asked about my child's day, coming across as very rude overall. My other complaint of the teacher is that they have told the classroom that a specific series of book is not allowed to be read in the class even though the series is very popular and geared towards the age and reading level. My child has complained of being bullied, students on the playground consistently using profanity and a very rude bus driver on top of it. The teaching is sub-par with more focus on testing instead of the actual teaching and I understand that the teachers have a busy schedule with the class as a whole, but there does not seem to be any attempt to help a student or two who are struggling a lot with a topic.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 14, 2011

We have 3 kids at SHE and we are very happy there. Like any school, you get out what you put in. Parent involvement is very important and highly encouraged. We just started another year with 3 great teachers.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted July 15, 2011

Average school. Some teachers are outstanding; organized and dedicated to student learning. You can feel enthusiasm when you walk into their classrooms. Some teachers need to be managed; rapport with students and parents is ineffective and teaching skills at minimum. Reading and math rotation have moved into the upper grades with mixed feelings among parents. Lost in transition happens to some kids. Homeroom teacher connection is not as strong. Kids are frequently tested for reading skills and math facts, but parents only receive student progress at conference and report card time, not at the end of reading and math rotations, leaving parents lost in rotation. Strong emphasis is placed on reading skills for struggling students and basic math facts. Would like to see challenge activities for kids who are strong academically. Nice library, great PE program, no music chorus? Sad! Strong parent volunteer group. Lots of new technology for classrooms. Would like to see teacher websites for homework assignments and classroom news and activity. Active principal, good communication to families.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 21, 2011

Wow - I am shocked to read some of these reviews! My family has been involved with Seattle Hill for 10 years, and my kids have had at least 10 teachers, not including specialty. NEVER have we experienced a teacher bullying our children! Our teachers at SHE have consistently shown that they care for the well-bring of our children, their education, and their personal growth. At the head of this amazing staff is our Principal, who has made the school a safe & welcoming environment for both kids and families. We experienced one bullying problem, & once brought to the attention of the Principal, the bully was dealt with immediately, with no further problems. Regarding the May 2 poster - we had ONE teacher leave this year (other than maternity)...I feel that the school is better off without her negative demeanor. I feel that the team-teaching approach has been very successful - my kids enjoy changing rooms, & seeing different teaching styles, which can only benefit them once they get to higher education! Obviously, it works for us, as my son has been a straight A student at SHE, Valley View MS and Glacier Peak High . I would highly recommend Seattle Hill!
—Submitted by a parent


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Math

The state average for Math was 65% in 2013.

88 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
44%

2012

 
 
29%

2011

 
 
64%

2010

 
 
65%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 73% in 2013.

88 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
71%

2012

 
 
35%

2011

 
 
76%

2010

 
 
85%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

The state average for Math was 63% in 2013.

75 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
33%

2012

 
 
34%

2011

 
 
67%

2010

 
 
71%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 73% in 2013.

76 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
53%

2012

 
 
47%

2011

 
 
74%

2010

 
 
88%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 62% in 2013.

76 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
42%

2012

 
 
43%

2011

 
 
71%

2010

 
 
80%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

The state average for Math was 63% in 2013.

69 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
59%

2012

 
 
38%

2011

 
 
63%

2010

 
 
54%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 73% in 2013.

69 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
60%

2012

 
 
45%

2011

 
 
78%

2010

 
 
82%
Science

The state average for Science was 67% in 2013.

68 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
52%

2012

 
 
33%

2011

 
 
69%

2010

 
 
27%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

The state average for Math was 59% in 2013.

66 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
42%

2012

 
 
31%

2011

 
 
68%

2010

 
 
57%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 72% in 2013.

68 students were tested at this school in 2013.

2013

 
 
58%

2012

 
 
35%

2011

 
 
79%

2010

 
 
76%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

All Students44%
Female34%
Male53%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White46%
Low income28%
Not low income52%
Special education17%
Not special education48%
Limited English18%
Migrantn/a

Reading

All Students71%
Female68%
Male73%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White73%
Low income55%
Not low income77%
Special education33%
Not special education76%
Limited English18%
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

All Students33%
Female28%
Male39%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic29%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White33%
Low income26%
Not low income35%
Special educationn/a
Not special education36%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Reading

All Students53%
Female59%
Male46%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic43%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White56%
Low income32%
Not low income59%
Special educationn/a
Not special education57%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Writing

All Students42%
Female42%
Male41%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic43%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White42%
Low income26%
Not low income45%
Special educationn/a
Not special education46%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

All Students59%
Female50%
Male67%
Blackn/a
Asian40%
Asian/Pacific Islander40%
Hispanicn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White64%
Low income58%
Not low income59%
Special educationn/a
Not special education63%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Reading

All Students60%
Female60%
Male61%
Blackn/a
Asian50%
Asian/Pacific Islander50%
Hispanicn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White64%
Low income50%
Not low income64%
Special educationn/a
Not special education65%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Science

All Students52%
Female42%
Male63%
Blackn/a
Asian40%
Asian/Pacific Islander40%
Hispanicn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White53%
Low income42%
Not low income57%
Special educationn/a
Not special education55%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

All Students42%
Female43%
Male42%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic50%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White43%
Low income28%
Not low income46%
Special educationn/a
Not special education45%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Reading

All Students58%
Female64%
Male51%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanic50%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White59%
Low income61%
Not low income57%
Special educationn/a
Not special education61%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2012-2013 Washington used the Measurements of Student Progress (MSP) to test students in reading and math in grades 3 through 8, in writing in grades 4 and 7, and in science in grades 5 and 8. The MSP is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings for this school are based on 2012-2013 test results. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
White 72% 60%
Hispanic 10% 20%
Asian or Asian/Pacific Islander 9% 7%
Two or more races 5% 6%
Black 3% 5%
American Indian/Alaska Native 1% 2%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander 0% 1%
Source: NCES, 2011-2012

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Transitional bilingual 17%N/A8%
Special education 18%N/A13%
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 225%N/A44%
Source: 1 WA OSPI, 2009-2010
Source: 2 NCES, 2011-2012

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per classroom teacher 20N/A17
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher experience

  This school District averageState average
Average years educational experience 12N/A12
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher education levels

  This school District averageState average
Master's degree or higher 58%N/A66%
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

This school has not yet provided program information.


Help other families

Millions of families turn to GreatSchools for help with their
school search. You can help these families by providing
a few details about this school.

Administrators & teachers: Let your school shine!

Help your school shine online by adding program highlights, photos and more on GreatSchools! Get started »

Upcoming Events

No upcoming events found for this school
Searching for school events...
Date
Title
  • {{date}}
    {{title}}
Export calendar
Outlook.com
Microsoft Outlook
iCal Format
Google Calendar
Print Calendar
Uploading, please wait...
POWERED BY
Tandem
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

12711 51st Ave SE
Everett, WA 98208
Phone: (360) 563-4675

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare

Nearby schools



Totem Falls
Snohomish, WA





ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT