Advertisement

GreatSchools Rating

Oak Harbor High School

Public | 9-12 | 1605 students

 
 
Last modified
Community Rating

3 stars

Community Rating by Year
2013:
Based on 1 rating
2012:
Based on 1 rating
2011:
Based on 2 ratings
2010:
Based on 2 ratings

Teacher quality

Principal leadership

Parent involvement

Rate this school

Click on stars to rate
Please select a star rating for this school.
    Helpful reviews answer questions:
  • What do you think others should know?
  • What do you like?
  • How could your school improve?
    Review Guidelines
    GreatSchools won’t post reviews that contain:
  • Inappropriate language
  • Allegations of criminal conduct
  • Names of students, teachers or staff
1200 characters remaining
Please indicate your relationship to the school.
Please read and accept our Terms of Use to join GreatSchools.
Indicates a required field

28 reviews of this school


Sort by:
Show reviews by:
Posted January 30, 2013

One important note:the school was completely renovated in 2010 so all prior reviews on the facilities are not completely valid. This school is competent, and beautiful. Offers a wide variety of award winning career and technical training: auto shop,metal design,CAD,culinary and video production. The school website will reveal many AP courses (13). My child took 5 over the course of 2 years. He scored a 4 on AP-History and 2/1 on the AP physics, language, calc, and World History; so not stellar performance. Can't necessarily blame the educators,but want to note that he received A's in regular class room; possibly due to the RE-DO policy. I am not impressed with the English instruction - see parent Nov 2010 review, still holds true today. Only major complaint is the fact that my child will receive A's on work that I would evaluate as B- or below. There is hardly any homework, and the school implements a "RE-DO" policy that hardly encourages the kids to try hard the first time around. As with any school, there are great teachers and teachers that should have retired long ago,who have lost their zest for education. Staff parental communication is hit or miss.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted March 18, 2012

I enjoyed this school. I just graduated last year, the first class to graduate from the completely renovated school. The hallways are slightly bigger and classrooms are too, but I think they could have better shaped classes and all indoor hallways. All of the teachers and administrators are interested in the well being of students and their success. I felt very close to each of my teachers. I think it helps that many teachers are in their 20's or 30's, and are coaches and club leaders, making them more relatable to students and more access-able. The perception that "drug use is on the rise" can be misleading as the students move through the grade levels and more people are exposed and start using. But no one knows how many people in each grade are using drugs except if they see them using. accusations and surveys cannot be an accurate representation because nothing is honest. I think that the career and tech classes and AP classes prepared me well for college and the school definitely works very hard to prepare students for a future that will be productive. Some rules seem unreasonable from a student stand point, but they are not up to the school, rather the district and state.
—Submitted by a student


Posted October 20, 2011

Our family is very happy with OHHS. A lot of schools are cutting important programs like AP and career and tech. Others are eliminating sports and activites. OHHS has maintained very strong programs in all these areas. Plus, the school facilities are amazing! We are impressed!
—Submitted by a parent


Posted February 16, 2011

This school has so much potential, the facilities are fantastic but true to the entire district, appearances are more important than substance. Teachers here are generally uninvolved and uninterested, administrators are worse, a large number of students are miltary and fairly transient, only here for a few years so the staffs accountability level is pathetic. The english and math departments are rediculously lacking. Example of staff involvement.. the last teacher or staff post here was dated 2006.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 19, 2010

OHHS is such a good school and we are very happy we moved to Oak Harbor! Compared with other high schools in the region, OHHS has superior facilities and much better programs and options for kids. Plus, the students in Oak Harbor are much better behaved and respectful than those in some other schools I have seen.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted November 18, 2010

the new building is nice, but the curb appeal doesn't bring excellence into the classrooms. I would say from watching my student, the English dept. is extremely lacking. There is little accountability to be held by the teachers and unless you have a very proactive teacher, students slip through the cracks. Thankfully our student has been blessed with 3 good teachers the past 2 years; teachers who try different teaching methods for different students and work with the parents for added success. Other than that, if it wasn't for additional home-schooling, my student wouldn't even know how to use punctuation, capitalization or proper grammer. It's hard to only blame the middle school, when the high schools giving him A's on such work.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted August 27, 2008

Hi-- No offense to the student posting on 8/25, but OHHS's WASL scores are far from outstanding. Look at the state average and see how the hgh school compares--I haven't seen 2008 data, but science and math scores from last year aren't outstanding
—Submitted by a student


Posted August 25, 2008

Everyone keeps saying how awful ohhs is, but I've been to 2 other highschools and I think it's amazing. Our wasl scores are outstanding and all of the problem are finally getting fixed.
—Submitted by a student


Posted April 3, 2008

I'm a student at this school and I agree with the poster two posts ago. Drug use is pretty much on the rise. I know of several fellow freshman that are at least smoking and skipping their afternoon classes. A few sophmores that smoke pot and skip days entirely. I also feel that the acidemic level of this school is terribly low. Maybe i just had too high of an expectation. I also would like to add that I'm glad we got a new stadium. Our old stadium was muddy, and horrible. Band was a complete disaster for the marching season. Our new one is nice, but I'm glad there is going to be a modernization of our high school. Our hallways are so small, and the doors open into the hallways sometimes making everything come to a stand still. (there is mold in the stage and the band room leaks)
—Submitted by a student


Posted November 1, 2007

The previous writer is not being fair or honest. A new $8 million stadium, yes, but the writer fails to mention that a $74 million modernization of the entire high school is underway. They're not just going to fix Parker Hall. They're building a complete new one, along with bigger classrooms and wider hallways. And, by the way, drug use is NOT on the rise. Iit is well below state averages, according to very thorough and long-term surveys.


Posted October 2, 2007

Oak Harbor High School lacks in maintaining the educatonal levels found in other school districts in the state. The disciplinary problems a the high school are rampant with drug use on on the rise. The school board found it appropriate to build a nine million dollar football stadium, yet Parker Hall continues to flood when it rains, the classrooms are small and the hall ways very narrow. Overall, Oak Harbor High School is a disgrace to the community unless of course you are a football fan.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted June 6, 2007

I think the running start program and other alternatives to the high school are the best things about Oak Harbor High School. There are some really good people that work at the school, but its the exception not the rule. I have had three children attend this school over the past six years and feel the overall condition is only getting worse.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 3, 2006

Running Start is fantastic Acedemics at the High School needs more funding to be successful. Plenty of Extracurricular activities with good competitivness considering this school has a large military attendence that comes and goes over few years. There is plenty of opportunity for parent involvement, just ask where needed.
—Submitted by Lori, a parent


Posted April 5, 2006

Although the school is up for a 'remodel,' it's too late to help those students already there. Hopefully, with the onset of the remodel, they will further improve the quality of their staff. There is a good selection of electives and, as long as you are willing to keep 'on them,' you can make sure your student has 'good' teacher. The sports teams will, hopefully, have a stadium soon.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted January 22, 2006

Oak Harbor High School is intentional about improvement. The administration, staff and parents are engaged in ongoing data collection and review in an effort to improved student learning and student experience. It is an exceptionally caring community.
—Submitted by a teacher


Posted November 23, 2005

Great experience. Lots of extracurricular activities and opportunities for future planning. Nice campus.
—Submitted by a former student


Posted November 21, 2005

this is truely a great school i recomind it to anyone that wants to raise thier child in a good academic atmostshpere.
—Submitted by a student


Posted October 29, 2005

The administration needs to take better control of their special needs children, whether they are on an IEP or 504. They lack the complete knowledge/training to identify and be responsable for these kids. What is important is not only the advanced kids, but ALL kids in the district.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted September 8, 2005

Teachers do the best with what the district funds them for, however school is overcrowded and facilities/technology need to be expanded/upgraded. Navy school partnering programs are a plus - there are a tremendous number of Navy single sailors and parents who volunteer time to mentor students. School safety and disciplline is pretty good because it's a small relatively remote rural town heavily influenced by the discipline, demeanor and relative conservative nature of military and civil service personnel.
—Submitted by a parent


Posted April 21, 2005

As a Junior attending this school I would have to say it is alright. It has great teachers and alot of promise. The only bad thing about it is the quality or the campus which is in dier need of renovation or just being torn down and rebuilt do to its lack of saftey codes and whatnot. The extra coricular is pretty good and it offers alot of Media Communications classes that from research myself alot of other schools don't. Over all I think this school is the best in the district.
—Submitted by Amanda, a student


Community ratings and reviews do not represent the views of GreatSchools nor does GreatSchools check their accuracy or verify the reviewers' identities. Use your discretion when evaluating these reviews.

About these ratings

The Community Rating is the school’s average rating from its community members (e.g., parents, students, and school staff). The highest possible rating is five stars; the lowest is one star.

The test results by subgroup show how the designated group of students is performing in comparison to the general population.
Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 56% in 2012.

245 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
58%

2011

 
 
n/a
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 81% in 2012.

110 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
92%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 91% in 2012.

108 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
95%

2011

 
 
96%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 45% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 94% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 27% in 2012.

45 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
26%

2011

 
 
29%
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 61% in 2012.

333 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
65%
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 59% in 2012.

164 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
64%

2011

 
 
74%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 23% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 36% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 27% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 44% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 37% in 2012.

46 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
37%

2011

 
 
45%
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 15% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 2

The state average for Integrated Math 2 was 21% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

The state average for Algebra I was 20% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Biology I

The state average for Biology I was 36% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a
Geometry

The state average for Geometry was 27% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Integrated Math 1

The state average for Integrated Math 1 was 29% in 2012.

2012

 
 
n/a

2011

 
 
n/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Students58%
Female52%
Malen/a
Black61%
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White58%
Low incomen/a
Not low income64%
Special educationn/a
Not special education60%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Students92%
Female94%
Male89%
Blackn/a
Asian91%
Asian/Pacific Islander91%
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White92%
Low income70%
Not low income97%
Special educationn/a
Not special education94%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Geometry

All Students95%
Female95%
Male96%
Blackn/a
Asian100%
Asian/Pacific Islander100%
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White95%
Low income95%
Not low income96%
Not special education95%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Students26%
Female32%
Male22%
Blackn/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
White29%
Low income38%
Not low income17%
Special educationn/a
Not special education33%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Students65%
Female61%
Male69%
Black61%
Asian75%
Asian/Pacific Islander76%
Hispanic43%
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White68%
Low income55%
Not low income70%
Special education19%
Not special education70%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Geometry

All Students64%
Female61%
Male66%
Black59%
Asian70%
Asian/Pacific Islander70%
Hispanic56%
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White66%
Low income66%
Not low income62%
Special educationn/a
Not special education65%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Biology I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Geometry

All Students37%
Female29%
Male41%
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Multiracialn/a
Native Americann/a
White36%
Low income52%
Not low income19%
Special educationn/a
Not special education38%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a

Integrated Math 2

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Algebra I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Special educationn/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Biology I

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a

Geometry

All Studentsn/a
Femalen/a
Malen/a
Blackn/a
Asiann/a
Asian/Pacific Islandern/a
Hispanicn/a
Whiten/a
Low incomen/a
Not low incomen/a
Not special educationn/a
Limited Englishn/a

Integrated Math 1

All Studentsn/a
Whiten/a
Not special educationn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used End-of-Course (EOC) examinations to assess students in Algebra I, Geometry, Integrated Math I, Integrated Math II, and Biology. The EOC tests are standards-based, which means they measure how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Math

The state average for Math was 42% in 2010.

390 students were tested at this school in 2010.

2010

 
 
39%
Reading

The state average for Reading was 81% in 2012.

356 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
81%

2011

 
 
80%

2010

 
 
77%
Science

The state average for Science was 50% in 2011.

376 students were tested at this school in 2011.

2011

 
 
47%

2010

 
 
42%
Writing

The state average for Writing was 85% in 2012.

346 students were tested at this school in 2012.

2012

 
 
84%

2011

 
 
87%

2010

 
 
83%
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to test students in reading and writing in grade 10. Math skills are tested by the End-of-Course (EOC) exams. The HSPE is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Reading

All Students81%
Female82%
Male80%
Black83%
Asian86%
Asian/Pacific Islander86%
Hispanic75%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White83%
Low income77%
Not low income83%
Special education26%
Not special education86%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a

Writing

All Students84%
Female86%
Male82%
Black90%
Asian97%
Asian/Pacific Islander97%
Hispanic77%
Native Americann/a
Pacific Islandern/a
White82%
Low income82%
Not low income84%
Special education43%
Not special education87%
Limited Englishn/a
Migrantn/a
Scale: % basic, level 3, or level 4

About the tests


In 2011-2012 Washington used the High School Proficiency Exam (HSPE) to test students in reading and writing in grade 10. Math skills are tested by the End-of-Course (EOC) exams. The HSPE is a standards-based test, which means it measures how well students are mastering specific skills defined for each grade by the state of Washington. The goal is for all students to score at or above the state standard.

The different student groups are identified by the Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. If there are fewer than 10 students in a particular group in a school, the state doesn't report data for that group.

See Washington's state standards

Source: Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction

Breaking down the GreatSchools Rating

GreatSchools Ratings are based on the most recent standardized test results for schools. Use the breakdown ratings below to compare types of students at this school. Learn more »


Student ethnicity

Ethnicity This school State average
White 66% 63%
Asian 16% 7%
Black 8% 5%
Hispanic 8% 18%
American Indian/Alaska Native 2% 2%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander 0% 1%
Two or more races 0% 5%
Source: NCES, 2010-2011

Student subgroups

  This school District averageState average
Students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch program 131%N/A40%
Special education 210%N/A13%
Transitional bilingual 21%N/A8%
Source: 1 NCES, 2010-2011
Source: 2 WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Student-teacher ratio

  This school District averageState average
Students per classroom teacher 20N/A17
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher experience

  This school District averageState average
Average years educational experience 11N/A12
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

Teacher education levels

  This school District averageState average
Master's degree or higher 71%N/A66%
Source: WA OSPI, 2009-2010

This school has not yet provided programming information.

Schools, join today to tell families more about what you offer.

Upcoming Events

No upcoming events found for this school
Searching for school events...
Date
Title
  • {{date}}
    {{title}}
Export calendar
Microsoft Outlook
iCal Format
Google Calendar
POWERED BY
Tandem
Notice an inaccuracy? Let us know!

950 NW 2nd Ave
Oak Harbor, WA 98277
Phone: (360) 279-5400

ADVERTISEMENT

Compare this school
to nearby schools

Compare schools »

Compare

Add this school to compare
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT